Literature DB >> 11673656

A comparison of gene expression signatures from breast tumors and breast tissue derived cell lines.

D T Ross1, C M Perou.   

Abstract

Cell lines derived from human tumors have historically served as the primary experimental model system for exploration of tumor cell biology and pharmacology. Cell line studies, however, must be interpreted in the context of artifacts introduced by selection and establishment of cell lines in vitro. This complication has led to difficulty in the extrapolation of biology observed in cell lines to tumor biology in vivo. Modern genomic analysis tool like DNA microarrays and gene expression profiling now provide a platform for the systematic characterization and classification of both cell lines and tumor samples. Studies using clinical samples have begun to identify classes of tumors that appear both biologically and clinically unique as inferred from their distinctive patterns of expressed genes. In this review, we explore the relationships between patterns of gene expression in breast tumor derived cell lines to those from clinical tumor specimens. This analysis demonstrates that cell lines and tumor samples have distinctive gene expression patterns in common and underscores the need for careful assessment of the appropriateness of any given cell line as a model for a given tumor subtype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11673656      PMCID: PMC3850857          DOI: 10.1155/2001/850531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Markers        ISSN: 0278-0240            Impact factor:   3.434


  63 in total

1.  Coexpression analysis of human genes across many microarray data sets.

Authors:  Homin K Lee; Amy K Hsu; Jon Sajdak; Jie Qin; Paul Pavlidis
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Epithelial mesenchymal transition traits in human breast cancer cell lines parallel the CD44(hi/)CD24 (lo/-) stem cell phenotype in human breast cancer.

Authors:  Tony Blick; Honor Hugo; Edwin Widodo; Mark Waltham; Cletus Pinto; Sendurai A Mani; Robert A Weinberg; Richard M Neve; Marc E Lenburg; Erik W Thompson
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 2.673

3.  DNA amplification method tolerant to sample degradation.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Elizabeth Maher; Cameron Brennan; Lynda Chin; Christopher Leo; Manjit Kaur; Penny Zhu; Martha Rook; Jia Liu Wolfe; G Mike Makrigiorgos
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Is the small heat shock protein alphaB-crystallin an oncogene?

Authors:  Sofia K Gruvberger-Saal; Ramon Parsons
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 5.  Molecular profiling in breast cancer.

Authors:  Shannon R Morris; Lisa A Carey
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.514

6.  Development and implementation of the SUM breast cancer cell line functional genomics knowledge base.

Authors:  Stephen P Ethier; Stephen T Guest; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Kent Armeson; Robert C Wilson; Kathryn Duchinski; Daniel Couch; Joe W Gray; Christiana Kappler
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-07-21

7.  Overview of human primary tumorgraft models: comparisons with traditional oncology preclinical models and the clinical relevance and utility of primary tumorgrafts in basic and translational oncology research.

Authors:  David H Lum; Cindy Matsen; Alana L Welm; Bryan E Welm
Journal:  Curr Protoc Pharmacol       Date:  2012-12

Review 8.  Unraveling the microenvironmental influences on the normal mammary gland and breast cancer.

Authors:  Britta Weigelt; Mina J Bissell
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 15.707

9.  Molecular profiling of breast cancer cell lines defines relevant tumor models and provides a resource for cancer gene discovery.

Authors:  Jessica Kao; Keyan Salari; Melanie Bocanegra; Yoon-La Choi; Luc Girard; Jeet Gandhi; Kevin A Kwei; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Pei Wang; Adi F Gazdar; John D Minna; Jonathan R Pollack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The functional loss of the retinoblastoma tumour suppressor is a common event in basal-like and luminal B breast carcinomas.

Authors:  Jason I Herschkowitz; Xiaping He; Cheng Fan; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.