Literature DB >> 11673267

Neonatal low- and high-dose exposure to estradiol benzoate in the male rat: I. Effects on the prostate gland.

O Putz1, C B Schwartz, S Kim, G A LeBlanc, R L Cooper, G S Prins.   

Abstract

Brief exposure of rats to high doses of natural estrogens early in life results in permanent alterations of the prostate gland, which include differentiation defects, altered gene expression, and dysplasia with aging. Whether low-dose treatments can cause similar effects in the developing prostate remains controversial. The current project was designed to determine the dose-response relationship of the prostate gland to estradiol exposure during the developmentally critical neonatal period in the rat. Male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were treated on Days 1, 3, and 5 of life by s.c. injections of a 7-log range of doses (0.015 microg/kg to 15.0 mg/kg) of beta-estradiol-3-benzoate (EB) in 25 microl of peanut oil (Arachis) as vehicle. In a separate block, neonatal Fisher 344 (F344) rats received 0.15, 15.0, or 1500.0 microg EB/kg. Rats were killed on Postnatal Day (PND) 35 or 90, and the prostates were microdissected, weighed, and frozen for immunohistochemistry. Preputial separation and hepatic testosterone hydroxlase activities were monitored and measured to determine the onset of puberty. On PND 35, there was an increase in prostate weights of SD rats treated with low doses of EB and a decrease in prostate weights of SD rats treated with high doses. The low-dose effect was entirely abolished by PND 90, and only high-dose suppression of organ sizes was found. The transient nature of the effect in low-dose animals suggests an advancement of puberty as the cause for increased reproductive organ weights on PND 35. F344 rats were more sensitive than SD rats to the suppressive effects of high doses of neonatal EB on PND 90. Despite this heightened responsiveness in the F344 rats, a low-dose estrogenic effect on adult prostate weights was not observed. Thus, in the rat model a sustained effect at low doses of natural estrogens is not present in the prostate glands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11673267     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod65.5.1496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  20 in total

Review 1.  Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses.

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Theo Colborn; Tyrone B Hayes; Jerrold J Heindel; David R Jacobs; Duk-Hee Lee; Toshi Shioda; Ana M Soto; Frederick S vom Saal; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller; John Peterson Myers
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 2.  Developmental estrogen exposures predispose to prostate carcinogenesis with aging.

Authors:  Gail S Prins; Lynn Birch; Wan-Yee Tang; Shuk-Mei Ho
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 3.143

3.  Differential effects of estrogen exposure on arylsulfatase B, galactose-6-sulfatase, and steroid sulfatase in rat prostate development.

Authors:  Leo Feferman; Sumit Bhattacharyya; Lynn Birch; Gail S Prins; Joanne K Tobacman
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 4.292

4.  Early-life estrogens and prostate cancer in an animal model.

Authors:  G S Prins; S-M Ho
Journal:  J Dev Orig Health Dis       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 5.  Role of estrogen receptor alpha and beta expression and signaling on cognitive function during aging.

Authors:  Thomas C Foster
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.899

6.  Impact of Low Dose Oral Exposure to Bisphenol A (BPA) on the Neonatal Rat Hypothalamic and Hippocampal Transcriptome: A CLARITY-BPA Consortium Study.

Authors:  Sheryl E Arambula; Scott M Belcher; Antonio Planchart; Stephen D Turner; Heather B Patisaul
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.736

7.  The role of Wnt5a in prostate gland development.

Authors:  Liwei Huang; Yongbing Pu; Wen Yang Hu; Lynn Birch; Douglas Luccio-Camelo; Terry Yamaguchi; Gail S Prins
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 8.  An evaluation of evidence for the carcinogenic activity of bisphenol A.

Authors:  Ruth A Keri; Shuk-Mei Ho; Patricia A Hunt; Karen E Knudsen; Ana M Soto; Gail S Prins
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 3.143

9.  Basic exploratory research versus guideline-compliant studies used for hazard evaluation and risk assessment: bisphenol A as a case study.

Authors:  Rochelle W Tyl
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Why public health agencies cannot depend on good laboratory practices as a criterion for selecting data: the case of bisphenol A.

Authors:  John Peterson Myers; Frederick S vom Saal; Benson T Akingbemi; Koji Arizono; Scott Belcher; Theo Colborn; Ibrahim Chahoud; D Andrew Crain; Francesca Farabollini; Louis J Guillette; Terry Hassold; Shuk-mei Ho; Patricia A Hunt; Taisen Iguchi; Susan Jobling; Jun Kanno; Hans Laufer; Michele Marcus; John A McLachlan; Angel Nadal; Jörg Oehlmann; Nicolás Olea; Paola Palanza; Stefano Parmigiani; Beverly S Rubin; Gilbert Schoenfelder; Carlos Sonnenschein; Ana M Soto; Chris E Talsness; Julia A Taylor; Laura N Vandenberg; John G Vandenbergh; Sarah Vogel; Cheryl S Watson; Wade V Welshons; R Thomas Zoeller
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.