Literature DB >> 11672549

Comparison of a novel norgestimate/ethinyl estradiol oral contraceptive (Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo) with the oral contraceptive Loestrin Fe 1/20.

R M Hampton1, M Short, E Bieber, C Bouchard, N Ayotte, G Shangold, A C Fisher, G W Creasy.   

Abstract

This multicenter study compared the contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, and safety of a new triphasic norgestimate (180/215/250 microg)/ethinyl estradiol 25 microg regimen (Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo) (n = 1,723) with that of norethindrone acetate 1 mg/ethinyl estradiol 20 microg (Loestrin Fe 1/20) (n = 1,171). Healthy women were treated for up to 13 cycles. Demographics were similar between regimens. Contraceptive efficacy was comparable for Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo and Loestrin Fe 1/20. The overall and method failure probabilities of pregnancy through 13 cycles were 1.9% and 1.5%, respectively, with Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo and 2.6% and 2.4%, respectively, with Loestrin Fe 1/20. Breakthrough bleeding and spotting was reported by a significantly lower percentage of participants in the Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo group compared with the Loestrin Fe 1/20 group. At representative Cycles 1, 3, 6, 9, and 13, breakthrough bleeding and spotting rates were 16.3, 11.5, 10.3, 7.9, and 7.7%, respectively, in the Ortho Tri-Cyclen Lo group and 34.9, 22.9, 22.2, 15.9, and 13.1%, respectively, in the Loestrin Fe 1/20 group. Compliance and safety data were similar for the two regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11672549     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00214-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  6 in total

Review 1.  Triphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Huib A A M Van Vliet; David A Grimes; Laureen M Lopez; Kenneth F Schulz; Frans M Helmerhorst
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-11-09

Review 2.  Noncontraceptive health benefits of oral contraceptives.

Authors:  Andrew M Kaunitz
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 3.  20 µg versus >20 µg estrogen combined oral contraceptives for contraception.

Authors:  Maria F Gallo; Kavita Nanda; David A Grimes; Laureen M Lopez; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-08-01

Review 4.  Interventions for enhancing medication adherence.

Authors:  Robby Nieuwlaat; Nancy Wilczynski; Tamara Navarro; Nicholas Hobson; Rebecca Jeffery; Arun Keepanasseril; Thomas Agoritsas; Niraj Mistry; Alfonso Iorio; Susan Jack; Bhairavi Sivaramalingam; Emma Iserman; Reem A Mustafa; Dawn Jedraszewski; Chris Cotoi; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-20

Review 5.  Hormonal contraception in adolescents: special considerations.

Authors:  Rollyn M Ornstein; Martin M Fisher
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 6.  Hormonal contraceptives for contraception in overweight or obese women.

Authors:  Laureen M Lopez; Alissa Bernholc; Mario Chen; Thomas W Grey; Conrad Otterness; Carolyn Westhoff; Alison Edelman; Frans M Helmerhorst
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.