A Baker1, T G Boggs, T J Lewin. 1. Centre for Mental Health Studies, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia. amanda.baker@newcastle.edu.au
Abstract
AIMS: To identify whether brief cognitive-behavioural interventions are feasible among regular users of amphetamine, to assess the effectiveness of intervention overall and to pilot two- and four-session interventions. DESIGN: Subjects were assigned randomly to individually receive a cognitive-behavioural intervention (n = 32) of either two or four sessions' duration or a self-help booklet (control condition; n = 32). SETTING:Subjects were volunteers recruited from needle exchange schemes and treatment centres in Newcastle, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Regular (at least monthly) users of amphetamine were recruited. INTERVENTION: Either four sessions of cognitive-behaviour therapy, consisting of a motivational interview and skills training in avoidance of high-risk situations, coping with craving and relapse prevention, or two sessions consisting of a motivational interview and discussion of skills. MEASUREMENTS: The Opiate Treatment Index was the main measure at pre-treatment and 6-month follow-up. FINDINGS: There was a significant reduction in amphetamine use among the sample as a whole, with inconclusive differences between intervention subgroups. There was a moderate overall intervention effect, with the intervention group reporting over twice the reduction in daily amphetamine use as the control group. Significantly more people in the cognitive-behavioural intervention condition abstained from amphetamine at 6-month follow-up compared to the control condition. CONCLUSION:Brief cognitive-behavioural interventions appear feasible among regular users of amphetamine. A larger randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of such interventions appears warranted.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To identify whether brief cognitive-behavioural interventions are feasible among regular users of amphetamine, to assess the effectiveness of intervention overall and to pilot two- and four-session interventions. DESIGN: Subjects were assigned randomly to individually receive a cognitive-behavioural intervention (n = 32) of either two or four sessions' duration or a self-help booklet (control condition; n = 32). SETTING: Subjects were volunteers recruited from needle exchange schemes and treatment centres in Newcastle, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Regular (at least monthly) users of amphetamine were recruited. INTERVENTION: Either four sessions of cognitive-behaviour therapy, consisting of a motivational interview and skills training in avoidance of high-risk situations, coping with craving and relapse prevention, or two sessions consisting of a motivational interview and discussion of skills. MEASUREMENTS: The Opiate Treatment Index was the main measure at pre-treatment and 6-month follow-up. FINDINGS: There was a significant reduction in amphetamine use among the sample as a whole, with inconclusive differences between intervention subgroups. There was a moderate overall intervention effect, with the intervention group reporting over twice the reduction in daily amphetamine use as the control group. Significantly more people in the cognitive-behavioural intervention condition abstained from amphetamine at 6-month follow-up compared to the control condition. CONCLUSION: Brief cognitive-behavioural interventions appear feasible among regular users of amphetamine. A larger randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of such interventions appears warranted.
Authors: Joshua L Gowin; Tali M Ball; Marc Wittmann; Susan F Tapert; Martin P Paulus Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Sarah Bowen; Neharika Chawla; Susan E Collins; Katie Witkiewitz; Sharon Hsu; Joel Grow; Seema Clifasefi; Michelle Garner; Anne Douglass; Mary E Larimer; Alan Marlatt Journal: Subst Abus Date: 2009 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 3.716
Authors: Susan G Sherman; Catherine Sutcliffe; Bangorn Srirojn; Carl A Latkin; Apinun Aramratanna; David D Celentano Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2008-11-03 Impact factor: 4.634