AIMS: To assess the accuracy of breast ultrasound scan (USS) performed by a surgeon in outpatients and to evaluate the additional contribution of USS to clinical diagnosis. METHODS: A prospective study of 302 patients with symptomatic breast disease (322 lumps) was performed. Group 1 consisted of 213 clinic USS of lumps surgically removed for appropriate clinical indications. In Group 2, a USS was performed on 231 lumps by both the surgeon and radiologists as part of triple assessment. Each clinic USS was compared to the surgical pathology (Group 1) or USS performed by the radiologist (Group 2). RESULTS: In Group 1 (n=213), 89 lumps were proven benign and 124 malignant on histology. Ultrasound scans performed by the surgeon compared to histology had a sensitivity of 98.3% and specificity of 91.7%. An abnormal clinic USS heightened the index of suspicion in 22/213 (10.3%) of cases felt clinically to be benign but subsequently confirmed malignant on histology. Fifty-seven lumps felt to be indeterminate clinically were correctly identified on USS by surgeon as benign (n=56) or malignant (n=1). In Group 2 (n=231), there was complete concordance of USS scans by surgeon and radiologists in 197 (96%) and complete discordance in eight (3.9%) patients. Of the discordant scans, the surgeon correctly identified 7/8 diagnoses on histology. A USS examination by the radiologists provided a correct diagnosis of 6/14 scans scored by the clinician as indeterminate. CONCLUSION: USS performed in outpatients by a breast surgeon is accurate and a useful adjunct to clinical assessment. This enables rapid diagnosis in one-stop breast clinics, selecting difficult diagnostic procedures for USS by radiologists at the same visit. Copyright 2001 Harcourt Publishers Limited.
AIMS: To assess the accuracy of breast ultrasound scan (USS) performed by a surgeon in outpatients and to evaluate the additional contribution of USS to clinical diagnosis. METHODS: A prospective study of 302 patients with symptomatic breast disease (322 lumps) was performed. Group 1 consisted of 213 clinic USS of lumps surgically removed for appropriate clinical indications. In Group 2, a USS was performed on 231 lumps by both the surgeon and radiologists as part of triple assessment. Each clinic USS was compared to the surgical pathology (Group 1) or USS performed by the radiologist (Group 2). RESULTS: In Group 1 (n=213), 89 lumps were proven benign and 124 malignant on histology. Ultrasound scans performed by the surgeon compared to histology had a sensitivity of 98.3% and specificity of 91.7%. An abnormal clinic USS heightened the index of suspicion in 22/213 (10.3%) of cases felt clinically to be benign but subsequently confirmed malignant on histology. Fifty-seven lumps felt to be indeterminate clinically were correctly identified on USS by surgeon as benign (n=56) or malignant (n=1). In Group 2 (n=231), there was complete concordance of USS scans by surgeon and radiologists in 197 (96%) and complete discordance in eight (3.9%) patients. Of the discordant scans, the surgeon correctly identified 7/8 diagnoses on histology. A USS examination by the radiologists provided a correct diagnosis of 6/14 scans scored by the clinician as indeterminate. CONCLUSION: USS performed in outpatients by a breast surgeon is accurate and a useful adjunct to clinical assessment. This enables rapid diagnosis in one-stop breast clinics, selecting difficult diagnostic procedures for USS by radiologists at the same visit. Copyright 2001 Harcourt Publishers Limited.