Literature DB >> 11669388

Noise exposure among construction electricians.

N S Seixas1, K Ren, R Neitzel, J Camp, M Yost.   

Abstract

Data-logging noise dosimetry was used to assess the exposure levels of electricians working for a major electrical subcontractor in Washington State at five sites using four types of construction methods. Subjects documented activities and work environment information throughout their work shift, resulting in an activity/exposure record for each of the 174 full-shift samples collected over the 4-month duration of the study. Over 24% of the TWA samples exceeded 85 dBA; 5.2% exceeded the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration permissible exposure limit of 90 dBA. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health exposure metric, which specifies a 3-dB ER, was also utilized; using this metric, 67.8% of the samples exceeded 85 dBA and 27% exceeded 90 dBA. Subjects were directly observed for a subset of 4469 min during which more detailed activity and environmental information was recorded. Linear and logistic regression models using this subset were used to identify the determinants of average exposure, and exposure exceedences, respectively. These models demonstrated the importance of multiple variable modeling in interpreting exposure assessments, and the feasibility and utility of modeling exposure exceedences using logistic regression. The results further showed that presumably quiet trades such as electrician are at risk of exposure to potentially harmful noise exposures, and that other workers' activities and the general environment contribute substantially to that risk. These results indicate that noise control strategies will have to address the construction work environment as an integrated system.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11669388     DOI: 10.1080/15298660108984661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIHAJ        ISSN: 1529-8663


  8 in total

1.  Predictors of hearing threshold levels and distortion product otoacoustic emissions among noise exposed young adults.

Authors:  N S Seixas; S G Kujawa; S Norton; L Sheppard; R Neitzel; A Slee
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Prospective noise induced changes to hearing among construction industry apprentices.

Authors:  N S Seixas; B Goldman; L Sheppard; R Neitzel; S Norton; S G Kujawa
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Predictors of hearing protection use in construction workers.

Authors:  Jane Edelson; Richard Neitzel; Hendrika Meischke; William Daniell; Lianne Sheppard; Bert Stover; Noah Seixas
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-06-16

Review 4.  Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Christina Tikka; Jos H Verbeek; Erik Kateman; Thais C Morata; Wouter A Dreschler; Silvia Ferrite
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-07

5.  Indicators of hearing protection use: self-report and researcher observation.

Authors:  Stephanie C Griffin; Richard Neitzel; William E Daniell; Noah S Seixas
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  A stochastic simulation framework for the prediction of strategic noise mapping and occupational noise exposure using the random walk approach.

Authors:  Lim Ming Han; Zaiton Haron; Khairulzan Yahya; Suhaimi Abu Bakar; Mohamad Ngasri Dimon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Occupational noise exposure of utility workers using task based and full shift measurement comparisons.

Authors:  David Michael Lowry; Lin Fritschi; Benjamin J Mullins
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-22

8.  Assessment of Occupational Noise Exposure among Groundskeepers in North Carolina Public Universities.

Authors:  Jo Anne G Balanay; Gregory D Kearney; Adam J Mannarino
Journal:  Environ Health Insights       Date:  2016-06-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.