Literature DB >> 11668407

First cut, then blend: an electrocautery technique affecting bleeding at sphincterotomy.

A Gorelick1, M Cannon, J Barnett, W Chey, J Scheiman, G Elta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The use of pure cut electrocautery current for endoscopic sphincterotomy lowers pancreatitis rates following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), but at the expense of greater localized bleeding which partially obscures the endoscopic view. We hypothesized that localized bleeding could be decreased by using blended current at the end of the sphincterotomy, without losing the benefit associated with pure cut current of lower post-ERCP pancreatitis benefit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing sphincterotomy were randomly allocated to receive pure cut current alone or a sequential combination of pure cut then blended current. In the sequential combination patients, the first 75 - 80 % of the sphincterotomy was done using pure cut current at 30 W and the remainder completed at a blend 2 setting (pure cut plus coagulation current), also at 30 W.
RESULTS: 142 patients were enrolled in the study. No statistical difference was noted between the two groups in the rates of overall pancreatitis or bleeding requiring transfusion. When comparing visible bleeding rates (more than a few drops), we found that there was significantly more bleeding (P < 0.05) in the pure cut group (31/75, 41 %) at the time of sphincterotomy compared with the sequential combination group (16/67, 23 %).
CONCLUSIONS: A sequential combination of pure cut and blended current for sphincterotomy caused less visible bleeding than pure cut alone. This occurred without a change in the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11668407     DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-17918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  6 in total

1.  Endocut Versus Conventional Blended Electrosurgical Current for Endoscopic Biliary Sphincterotomy: A Meta-Analysis of Complications.

Authors:  De-Feng Li; Mei-Feng Yang; Xin Chang; Nan-Nan Wang; Fang-Fang Tan; Hai-Na Xie; Xue Fang; Shu-Ling Wang; Wei Fan; Jian-Yao Wang; Zhi-Chao Yu; Cheng Wei; Feng Xiong; Ting-Ting Liu; Ming-Han Luo; Li-Sheng Wang; Zhao-Shen Li; Jun Yao; Yu Bai
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: how to avoid and manage them.

Authors:  Nicholas M Szary; Firas H Al-Kawas
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-08

Review 3.  Pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography.

Authors:  Ayman M Abdel Aziz; Glen A Lehman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Authors:  Lin-Lee Wong; Her-Hsin Tsai
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2014-02-15

5.  Does rectal indomethacin given for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis increase bleeding after biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy or cardiovascular mortality?: Post hoc analysis using prospective clinical trial data.

Authors:  Árpád Patai; Norbert Solymosi; Árpád V Patai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Safety of different electrocautery modes for endoscopic sphincterotomy: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Abdellah Hedjoudje; Chérifa Cheurfa; Jad Farha; Bénédicte Jaïs; Alain Aubert; Diane Lorenzo; Frédérique Maire; Dilhana Badurdeen; Vivek Kumbhari; Frédéric Prat
Journal:  Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-12-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.