Literature DB >> 11660490

Rogers v. Whitaker and informed consent in Australia: a fair dinkum duty of disclosure.

Don Chalmers, Robert Schwartz.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Canterbury v. Spence; Legal Approach; Professional Patient Relationship; Rogers v. Whitaker; Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital

Mesh：

Year:  1993        PMID： 11660490     DOI： 10.1093/medlaw/1.2.139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Law Rev        ISSN： 0967-0742            Impact factor:   1.267


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  The need to know--therapeutic privilege: a way forward.

Authors:  Kate Hodkinson
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2013-06

Review 2.  Legal disputes over duties to disclose treatment risks to patients: a review of negligence claims and complaints in Australia.

Authors:  Marie M Bismark; Andrew J Gogos; Richard B Clark; Russell L Gruen; Atul A Gawande; David M Studdert
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 11.069
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.