Literature DB >> 11660357

Cochlear implants and the claims of culture? A response to Lane and Grodin.

Dena S Davis.   

Abstract

Because I reject the notion that physical characteristics constitute cultural membership, I argue that, even if the claim were persuasive that deafness is a culture rather than a disability, there is no reason to fault hearing parents who choose cochlear implants for their deaf children.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 11660357     DOI: 10.1353/ken.1997.0022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J        ISSN: 1054-6863


  4 in total

1.  Beyond (Models of) Disability?

Authors:  Jonas-Sébastien Beaudry
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2016-02-18

2.  Ethical dimension of paediatric cochlear implantation.

Authors:  R Nunes
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001-08

3.  Enhancement technology and outcomes: what professionals and researchers can learn from those skeptical about cochlear implants.

Authors:  Patrick Kermit
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2012-12

4.  Hearing Parents' Voices: Parental Refusal of Cochlear Implants and the Zone of Parental Discretion.

Authors:  Owen M Bradfield
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.352

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.