Literature DB >> 11659356

Virtue theory and abortion.

Rosalind Hursthouse.   

Abstract

The sort of ethical theory derived from Aristotle, variously described as virtue ethics, virtue-based ethics, or neo-Aristotelianism, is becoming better known, and is now quite widely recognized as at least a possible rival to deontological and utilitarian theories. With recognition has come criticism, of varying quality. In this article I shall discuss nine separate criticisms that I have frequently encountered, most of which seem to me to betray an inadequate grasp either of the structure of virtue theory or of what would be involved in thinking about a real moral issue in its terms. In the first half I aim particularly to secure an understanding that will reveal that many of these criticisms are simply misplaced, and to articulate what I take to be the major criticism of virtue theory. I reject this criticism, but do not claim that it is necessarily misplaced. In the second half I aim to deepen that understanding and highlight the issues raised by the criticisms by illustrating what the theory looks like when it is applied to a particular issue, in this case, abortion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Aristotle; Genetics and Reproduction; Philosophical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 11659356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Public Aff        ISSN: 0048-3915


  5 in total

1.  Devotion, Diversity, and Reasoning: Religion and Medical Ethics.

Authors:  Michael D Dahnke
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Conscientious objection and person-centered care.

Authors:  Stephen Buetow; Natalie Gauld
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2018-04

3.  The harm of medical disorder as harm in the damage sense.

Authors:  David G Limbaugh
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2019-02

4.  Enhancing Moral Conformity and Enhancing Moral Worth.

Authors:  Thomas Douglas
Journal:  Neuroethics       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 1.480

5.  Why is Cognitive Enhancement Deemed Unacceptable? The Role of Fairness, Deservingness, and Hollow Achievements.

Authors:  Nadira S Faber; Julian Savulescu; Thomas Douglas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.