Literature DB >> 11655335

Participants' understanding of the process of psychological research: informed consent.

Janet L Brody, John P Gluck, Alfredo S Aragon.   

Abstract

Sixty-five undergraduates participating in a wide range of psychological research experiments were interviewed in depth about their research experiences and their views on the process of informed consent. Overall, 32% of research experiences were characterized positively and 41% were characterized negatively. One major theme of the negative experiences was that experiments were perceived as too invasive, suggesting incomplete explication of negative aspects of research during the informed consent process. Informed consent experiences were viewed positively 80% of the time. However, most of the participants had a limited view of the purpose of informed consent: less than 20% viewed the process as a decision point. Results suggest a number of common pitfalls to standard informed consent practices that have not generally been recognized. Results are discussed in terms of both ethical and methodological implications. Suggestions for improving the informed consent process are also provided.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach; University of New Mexico

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 11655335     DOI: 10.1207/s15327019eb0704_1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethics Behav        ISSN: 1050-8422


  2 in total

1.  Perspectives on medical research involving men in schizophrenia and HIV-related protocols.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Teddy D Warner; Katherine A Green Hammond; Cynthia M A Geppert
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Impact of Open Data Policies on Consent to Participate in Human Subjects Research: Discrepancies between Participant Action and Reported Concerns.

Authors:  Jorden A Cummings; Jessica M Zagrodney; T Eugene Day
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.