Literature DB >> 11654977

Gender differences in attitudes toward animal research.

Jennifer J Eldridge, John P Gluck.   

Abstract

Although gender differences in attitudes toward animal research have been reported in the literature for some time, exploration into the nature of these differences has received less attention. This article examines gender differences in responses to a survey of attitudes toward the use of animals in research. The survey was completed by college students and consisted of items intended to tap different issues related to the animal research debate. Results indicated that women were more likely than men to support tenets of the animal protection movement. Likewise, women were more likely than men to favor increased restrictions on animal use and were more concerned than men about the suffering of research animals. Analysis of item contents suggested that women endorsed items reflecting a general caring for animals, were more willing than men to make personal sacrifices such as giving up meat and medical benefits in an effort to protect animals, and were more likely than men to question the use of animals in research on scientific grounds. Men, on the other hand, tended to emphasize the potential benefits arising from the use of animals in research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 11654977     DOI: 10.1207/s15327019eb0603_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethics Behav        ISSN: 1050-8422


  10 in total

1.  Description of dogs and owners in outdoor built-up areas and their more-than-human issues.

Authors:  Florence Gaunet; Elodie Pari-Perrin; Geneviève Bernardin
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Becoming a good doctor: perceived need for ethics training focused on practical and professional development topics.

Authors:  Laura W Roberts; Teddy D Warner; Katherine A Green Hammond; Cynthia M A Geppert; Thomas Heinrich
Journal:  Acad Psychiatry       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

Review 3.  What We Know about the Public's Level of Concern for Farm Animal Welfare in Food Production in Developed Countries.

Authors:  Amelia Cornish; David Raubenheimer; Paul McGreevy
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Stakeholder Perceptions of Welfare Issues and Indicators for Extensively Managed Sheep in Australia.

Authors:  Amanda K Doughty; Grahame J Coleman; Geoff N Hinch; Rebecca E Doyle
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Factors influencing public support for dairy tie stall housing in the U.S.

Authors:  Jesse A Robbins; Caitlin Roberts; Daniel M Weary; Becca Franks; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Differences in public and producer attitudes toward animal welfare in the red meat industries.

Authors:  Grahame J Coleman; Paul H Hemsworth; Lauren M Hemsworth; Carolina A Munoz; Maxine Rice
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-12

7.  Ethics teaching in a medical education environment: preferences for diversity of learning and assessment methods.

Authors:  Tahra AlMahmoud; M Jawad Hashim; Margaret Ann Elzubeir; Frank Branicki
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2017

8.  A Survey of Public Opinion on Cat (Felis catus) Predation and the Future Direction of Cat Management in New Zealand.

Authors:  Jessica K Walker; Stephanie J Bruce; Arnja R Dale
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Perception of animal sentience by Brazilian and French citizens: The case of sheep welfare and sentience.

Authors:  Priscilla Regina Tamioso; Daniel Santiago Rucinque; Mara Miele; Alain Boissy; Carla Forte Maiolino Molento
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Demographics Regarding Belief in Non-Human Animal Sentience and Emotional Empathy with Animals: A Pilot Study among Attendees of an Animal Welfare Symposium.

Authors:  Amelia Cornish; Bethany Wilson; David Raubenheimer; Paul McGreevy
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.