Literature DB >> 11653398

Are research subjects adequately protected? A review and discussion of studies conducted by the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.

Nancy E Kass, Jeremy Sugarman.   

Abstract

In light of information uncovered about human radiation experiments conducted during the Cold War, an important charge for the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments was to assess the current state of protections for human research subjects. This assessment was designed to enhance the Committee's ability to make informed recommendations for the improvement of future policies and practices for the protection of research subjects. The Committee's examination of current protections revealed great improvement over those from the past, yet some problems remain. Although the data collected by the Committee highlight specific areas in need of attention, the Committee's work should be viewed in part as the beginning of a series of ongoing assessments of the adequacy and effectiveness of the protections afforded to human subjects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach; Federal Policy (Common Rule) for the Protection of Human Subjects 1991; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 11653398     DOI: 10.1353/ken.1996.0026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J        ISSN: 1054-6863


  2 in total

1.  Motivations, understanding, and voluntariness in international randomized trials.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Suzanne Maman; Joan Atkinson
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

Review 2.  Partnership as an ethical model for medical research in developing countries: the example of the "implementation trial".

Authors:  D W Dowdy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.903

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.