Literature DB >> 11651140

Are research participants truly informed? Readability of informed consent forms used in research.

James R P Ogloff, Randy K Otto.   

Abstract

Researchers typically attempt to fulfill disclosure and informed consent requirements by having participants read and sign consent forms. The present study evaluated the reading levels of informed consent forms used in psychology research and other fields (medical research; social science and education research; and health, physical education, and recreation research). Two standardized measures of readability were employed to analyze a randomly selected sample (N = 108) of informed consent forms used in Institutional Review Board-approved research projects at a midwestern university during the 1987-1988 academic year. Results indicate that informed consent forms are typically written at a higher reading level than is appropriate for the intended population and that there are no consistently significant differences in readability among areas of research or between college student and noncollege student participants. Due to the unacceptably high reading level of the consent forms, one must question whether participants can comprehend the information contained in the consent form.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 11651140     DOI: 10.1207/s15327019eb0104_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethics Behav        ISSN: 1050-8422


  13 in total

1.  Binational Substance Abuse Research and Internal Review Boards: Human Subject Risks and Suggestions for Protections.

Authors:  Victor Garcia
Journal:  Hum Organ       Date:  2009

Review 2.  The promise of empirical research in the study of informed consent theory and practice.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Marie Caputo; Christopher Burant
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2004-03

3.  Conducting Health Disparities Research with Criminal Justice Populations: Examining Research, Ethics, and Participation.

Authors:  Pamela Valera; Stephanie Cook; Ruth Macklin; Yvonne Chang
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2014-03-01

4.  Conceptualizing the role of research literacy in advancing societal health.

Authors:  Janet L Brody; Jeanne Dalen; Robert D Annett; David G Scherer; Charles W Turner
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2011-10-21

5.  Children's understanding of the risks and benefits associated with research.

Authors:  T M Burke; R Abramovitch; S Zlotkin
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: feasibility, approach, and results.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Holly A Taylor; Joseph Ali; Kristina Hallez; Lelia Chaisson
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.486

7.  Using computer agents to explain medical documents to patients with low health literacy.

Authors:  Timothy W Bickmore; Laura M Pfeifer; Michael K Paasche-Orlow
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2009-03-17

8.  Ethical problems in psychiatric research.

Authors:  N S Lehrman; V H Sharav
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1997

9.  Gay and Bisexual Men's Perceptions of the Donation and Use of Human Biological Samples for Research: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Chris Patterson; Lisa M McDaid; Shona Hilton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Appropriateness of Language Found in Research Consent Form Templates: A Computational Linguistic Analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Villafranca; Stephanie Kereliuk; Colin Hamlin; Andrea Johnson; Eric Jacobsohn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.