Literature DB >> 11644876

Covert video surveillance continues to provoke debate.

Elliot A Shinebourne.   

Abstract

When the editor invites comment on a response to an analysis of a criticism of a protocol already defended by the author in this journal, the issue is clearly contentious. I will comment briefly on Thomas's paper in this issue of the journal, and look at points of agreement as well as dissent.

Keywords:  Legal Approach; Professional Patient Relationship; Royal Brompton Hospital (London)

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 11644876      PMCID: PMC1377118          DOI: 10.1136/jme.22.6.351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  4 in total

1.  Covert video surveillance: the Staffordshire Protocol--a response to Dr Shinebourne.

Authors:  T Thomas
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Covert video surveillance--an assessment of the Staffordshire protocol.

Authors:  T Thomas
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Some ethical issues surrounding covert video surveillance--a response.

Authors:  D P Southall; M P Samuels
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Covert video surveillance and the principle of double effect: a response to criticism.

Authors:  E A Shinebourne
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.903

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.