Literature DB >> 11642695

The time-limited influence of sentential context on function word identification.

P van Alphen1, J M McQueen.   

Abstract

Sentential context effects on the identification of the Dutch function words te (to) and de (the) were examined. In Experiment 1, listeners labeled words on a [t inverted e]-[d inverted e] continuum more often as te when the context waste biased (Ik probeer [? inverted e] schieten [I try to/the shoot]) than when it was de biased (Ik probeer [? inverted e] schoenen [I try to/the shoes]). The effect was weaker in slower responses. In Experiment 2, disambiguation began later, in the second word after [? inverted e]. There was a weak context effect only in the slower responses. In Experiments 3 and 4, disambiguation occurred on the word before [? inverted e]: There was no context effect when one set of sentences was used, but there was an effect (larger in the faster responses) when more sentences were used. Syntactic processing affects word identification only within a limited time frame. It appears to do so not by influencing lexical access processes through feedback but, instead, by biasing decision making.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11642695     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.27.5.1057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  6 in total

1.  Context effects on musical chord categorization: Different forms of top-down feedback in speech and music?

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Joel L Dennhardt; Andrew Struck-Marcell
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-07

2.  Visual speech acts differently than lexical context in supporting speech perception.

Authors:  Arthur G Samuel; Jerrold Lieblich
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Integration of pragmatic and phonetic cues in spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Hannah Rohde; Marc Ettlinger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  (Not) Hearing Optional Subjects: The Effects of Pragmatic Usage Preferences.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; Charles Clifton; Lyn Frazier; Patrick V Taylor
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Combined predictive effects of sentential and visual constraints in early audiovisual speech processing.

Authors:  Heidi Solberg Økland; Ana Todorović; Claudia S Lüttke; James M McQueen; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Prediction, Bayesian inference and feedback in speech recognition.

Authors:  Dennis Norris; James M McQueen; Anne Cutler
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.331

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.