Literature DB >> 11641311

Carotid pressure is a better predictor of coronary artery disease severity than brachial pressure.

T K Waddell1, A M Dart, T L Medley, J D Cameron, B A Kingwell.   

Abstract

The mechanisms relating pulse pressure to cardiovascular outcome may include surrogacy for coronary disease severity. Although pulse pressure is typically measured at the brachial artery, central pulse pressure and its principal determinant, large-artery stiffness, may relate more closely to disease severity. This study aimed to determine the relationships between large-artery stiffness and carotid and brachial blood pressures and coronary artery disease severity. One hundred fourteen male patients with coronary artery disease (age 60+/-8 years, mean+/-SD) and 57 age-matched healthy male controls (age 59+/-9 years) were recruited. Patients were classified into 2 groups based on the magnitude of their maximum coronary stenosis: moderate (50% to 89%) and severe (>/=90%). Large-artery stiffness was assessed as systemic arterial compliance and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. Mean pressure was not different between the 3 groups. Systemic compliance and carotid pulse pressure were significantly different between all 3 groups, with compliance lowest and pressure highest in the severe group (P<0.05). Pulse wave velocity was higher in patients with severe stenosis than in those with moderate stenosis (P<0.01) and those in the control group (P<0.001). Brachial pulse pressure was higher in patients than in controls (P<0.05), but there was no difference between the 2 disease groups. In separate multivariate analyses, carotid pressures and systemic arterial compliance were determinants of coronary artery disease severity, independent of age, smoking status, body mass index, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, cholesterol levels (total, LDL, and HDL), triglycerides, and beta-antagonist and lipid-lowering therapy (P<0.001), whereas brachial pressures and pulse wave velocity were not. In conclusion, central blood pressures and systemic arterial compliance are more sensitive markers of coronary artery disease severity than brachial pressures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11641311     DOI: 10.1161/hy1001.096107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  29 in total

Review 1.  Continuous and less invasive central hemodynamic monitoring by blood pressure waveform analysis.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Mukkamala; Da Xu
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 4.733

2.  Distal shift of arterial pressure wave reflection sites with aging.

Authors:  Jun Sugawara; Koichiro Hayashi; Hirofumi Tanaka
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 3.  Arterial stiffness: is it ready for prime time?

Authors:  Stanley S Franklin
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Hypertension in African Americans.

Authors:  Nomsa Musemwa; Crystal A Gadegbeku
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Association between systemic arterial stiffness and age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Eiichi Sato; Gilbert T Feke; Ephraim Y Appelbaum; Marcel N Menke; Clement L Trempe; J Wallace McMeel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-01-13       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 6.  Antihypertensive drugs and central blood pressure.

Authors:  Carmel M McEniery
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 7.  Arterial Stiffness and Coronary Ischemia: New Aspects and Paradigms.

Authors:  Alexandre Vallée; Alexandre Cinaud; Athanase Protogerou; Yi Zhang; Jirar Topouchian; Michel E Safar; Jacques Blacher
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 5.369

8.  Relationship between sleep-disordered breathing and central systolic blood pressure in a community-based population: the Toon Health Study.

Authors:  Kenta Igami; Koutatsu Maruyama; Kiyohide Tomooka; Ai Ikeda; Yasuharu Tabara; Katsuhiko Kohara; Isao Saito; Takeshi Tanigawa
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.872

9.  The relationship between carotid blood pressure reactivity to mental stress and carotid intima-media thickness.

Authors:  Nicole L Spartano; Jacqueline A Augustine; Wesley K Lefferts; Brooks B Gump; Kevin S Heffernan
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 5.162

10.  Aortic stiffness improves the prediction of both diagnosis and severity of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Alexandra Yannoutsos; Mathieu Ahouah; Céline Dreyfuss Tubiana; Jirar Topouchian; Michel E Safar; Jacques Blacher
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 3.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.