Literature DB >> 11640226

T.H. Huxley's criticism of German cell theory: an epigenetic and physiological interpretation of cell structure.

M L Richmond1.   

Abstract

In 1853, the young Thomas Henry Huxley published a long review of German cell theory in which he roundly criticized the basic tenets of the Schleiden-Schwann model of the cell. Although historians of cytology have dismissed Huxley's criticism as based on an erroneous interpretation of cell physiology, the review is better understood as a contribution to embryology. "The Cell-theory" presents Huxley's "epigenetic" interpretation of histological organization emerging from changes in the protoplasm to replace the "preformationist" cell theory of Schleiden and Schwann (as modified by Albert von Kolliker), which posited the nucleus as the seat of organic vitality. Huxley's views influenced a number of British biologists, who continued to oppose German cell theory well into the twentieth century. Yet Huxley was pivotal in introducing the new German program of "scientific zoology" to Britain in the early 1850s, championing its empiricist methodology as a means to enact broad disciplinary and institutional reforms in British natural history.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11640226     DOI: 10.1023/a:1004881730937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hist Biol        ISSN: 0022-5010            Impact factor:   0.818


  16 in total

1.  Protozoa as precursors of metazoa: German cell theory and its critics at the turn of the century.

Authors:  M L Richmond
Journal:  J Hist Biol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.326

2.  The origins of T. H. Huxley's saltationism: history in Darwin's shadow.

Authors:  S L Lyons
Journal:  J Hist Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.326

3.  'Nature' in the laboratory: domestication and discipline with the microscope in Victorian life science.

Authors:  G Gooday
Journal:  Br J Hist Sci       Date:  1991-09

4.  How might we map the cultural fields of science? Politics and organisms in restoration France.

Authors:  J V Pickstone
Journal:  Hist Sci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 0.892

5.  The problem of the organic individual: Ernst Haeckel and the development of the biogenetic law.

Authors:  R G Rinard
Journal:  J Hist Biol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.326

6.  The influence of Karl Ernst von Baer's embryology, 1828-1859: a reappraisal in light of Richard Owen's and William B. Carpenter's "palaeontological application of 'Von Baer's Law".

Authors:  D Ospovat
Journal:  J Hist Biol       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.326

7.  John Goodsir and the making of cellular reality.

Authors:  L S Jacyna
Journal:  J Hist Biol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.326

8.  The romantic programme and the reception of cell theory in Britain.

Authors:  L S Jacyna
Journal:  J Hist Biol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.326

9.  Richard Owen's vertebrate archetype.

Authors:  N A Rupke
Journal:  Isis       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 10.  De Partibus Similaribus.

Authors:  T H Huxley
Journal:  Br Foreign Med Chir Rev       Date:  1853-10
View more
  4 in total

1.  The birth of cell biology.

Authors:  Iain Scott; David C Logan
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 10.151

2.  Cell theory, specificity, and reproduction, 1837-1870.

Authors:  Staffan Müller-Wille
Journal:  Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci       Date:  2010-08-02

3.  Redefining the X axis: "professionals," "amateurs" and the making of mid-Victorian biology, a progress report.

Authors:  A Desmond
Journal:  J Hist Biol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 0.818

4.  "I would sooner die than give up": Huxley and Darwin's deep disagreement.

Authors:  Mary P Winsor
Journal:  Hist Philos Life Sci       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 1.205

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.