Literature DB >> 1163829

Recovery and simulated driving after intravenous anesthesia with thiopental, methohexital, propanidid, or alphadione.

K Korttila, M Linnoila, P Ertama, S Häkkinen.   

Abstract

Recovery from anesthesia was assessed in a double-bind manner in 40 healthy volunteer students after intravenous anesthesia with thiopental (6.0 mg/kg), methohexital (2.0 mg/kg), propanidid (6.6 mg/kg), or alphadione (Althesin), 85 mul/kg using a driving simulator 2,4, 6, and 8 hours after injection of the drugs. Clinical recovery was faster after propanidid and methohexital than after thiopental or alphadione. Driving performances remained significantly (P less than 0.05) worse than in a control group for 6 hours after thiopental and for 8 hours after methohexital, and reaction times 8 hours after thiopental remained worse than in the control subjects. After alphadione driving skills were impaired at 6 hours only. Propanidid produced no impairment in driving skills at any time during the experiment. It is concluded that after the doses used in this study patients should not drive or operate machinery for at least 2 hours after propanidid and for at least 8 hours after alphadione. After methohexital and thiopental patients should probably not drive for 24 hours because of the severity of the disturbances at 8 hours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1163829     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-197509000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  10 in total

Review 1.  General anesthesia.

Authors:  M Rosenberg; J Weaver
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1991 Jul-Oct

2.  Recovery from anaesthesia in outpatients: a comparison of narcotic and inhalational techniques.

Authors:  A C Enright; A Pace-Floridia
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1977-09

3.  Pharmacokinetics of intravenous anaesthetics: implications for clinical use.

Authors:  M M Ghoneim; K Korttila
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1977 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Profile of recovery after general anaesthesia.

Authors:  M Herbert; T E Healy; J B Bourke; I R Fletcher; J M Rose
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-05-14

Review 5.  Drugs, alcohol and driving.

Authors:  T Seppala; M Linnoila; M J Mattila
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Stabilometry: a new tool for the measurement of recovery following general anaesthesia for out-patients.

Authors:  D J Steward; G Volgyesi
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1978-01

7.  Double blind comparison of alfentanil N2O and fentanyl N2O for outpatient surgical procedures.

Authors:  A B Enright; J B Parker
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  Pre-anaesthetic medication in paediatric day-care surgery.

Authors:  R Desjardins; S Ansara; J Charest
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1981-03

Review 9.  Anaesthesia for day-care surgery: a review.

Authors:  J E Goold
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 18.000

10.  Effectiveness of sodium thiopentone, propofol, and etomidate as an ideal intravenous anesthetic agent for modified electroconvulsive therapy.

Authors:  Altaf Hussain Mir; Nida Farooq Shah; Mehraj Ud Din; Shabir Ahmad Langoo; Fayaz Ahmad Reshi
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.