Literature DB >> 11606873

The Medicaid Rx model: pharmacy-based risk adjustment for public programs.

T Gilmer1, R Kronick, P Fishman, T G Ganiats.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk adjustment models typically use diagnoses from claims or encounter records to assess illness severity. However, concerns about the availability and reliability of diagnostic data raise the potential for alternative methods of risk adjustment. Here, we explore the use of pharmacy data as an alternative or complement to diagnostic data in risk adjustment.
OBJECTIVES: To develop and test a pharmacy-based risk adjustment model for SSI and TANF Medicaid populations. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Pharmacological review combined with empirical evaluation. We developed the Medicaid Rx model, a system that classifies a subset of the National Drug Codes into categories that can be used for risk-assessment and risk-adjusted payment.
SUBJECTS: Subjects consisted of 362,370 persons with disability and 1.5 million AFDC and TANF beneficiaries in California, Colorado, Georgia, and Tennessee during 1990-1999. MEASURES: We compare pharmacy and diagnostic classification for three chronic diseases. We also compare R2 statistics and use simulated health plans to evaluate the performance of alternative models.
RESULTS: Pharmacy and diagnostic classification vary in their ability to identify specific chronic disease. Using simulated plans, diagnostic models are better at predicting expenditures than are pharmacy-based models for disabled Medicaid beneficiaries, although the models perform similarly for TANF Medicaid beneficiaries. Models that combine diagnostic and pharmacy data have superior overall performance.
CONCLUSIONS: The performance of risk adjustment models using a combination of pharmacy and diagnostic data are superior to that of models using either data source alone, particularly among TANF beneficiaries. Concerns regarding variations in prescribing patterns and the incentives that may follow from linking payment to pharmacy use warrant further research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11606873     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200111000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  36 in total

1.  Risk segmentation related to the offering of a consumer-directed health plan: a case study of Humana Inc.

Authors:  Laura A Tollen; Murray N Ross; Stephen Poor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Changes in per member per month expenditures after implementation of Florida's Medicaid reform demonstration.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Harman; Christy H Lemak; Mona Al-Amin; Allyson G Hall; Robert Paul Duncan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Risk Adjustment Tools for Learning Health Systems: A Comparison of DxCG and CMS-HCC V21.

Authors:  Todd H Wagner; Anjali Upadhyay; Elizabeth Cowgill; Theodore Stefos; Eileen Moran; Steven M Asch; Peter Almenoff
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  The effect of substance abuse treatment on Medicaid expenditures among general assistance welfare clients in Washington state.

Authors:  Thomas M Wickizer; Antoinette Krupski; Kenneth D Stark; David Mancuso; Kevin Campbell
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  Medicaid expenditures on psychotropic medications for children in the child welfare system.

Authors:  Ramesh Raghavan; Derek S Brown; Hope Thompson; Susan L Ettner; Lisa M Clements; Whitney Key
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.576

Review 6.  Retrospective economic and outcomes analyses using non-US databases: a review.

Authors:  Lizheng Shi; Eric Q Wu; Meredith Hodges; Andrew Yu; Howard Birnbaum
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Health Care Use and Spending for Medicaid Enrollees in Federally Qualified Health Centers Versus Other Primary Care Settings.

Authors:  Robert S Nocon; Sang Mee Lee; Ravi Sharma; Quyen Ngo-Metzger; Dana B Mukamel; Yue Gao; Laura M White; Leiyu Shi; Marshall H Chin; Neda Laiteerapong; Elbert S Huang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Comparative performance of comorbidity indices in predicting health care-related behaviors and outcomes among Medicaid enrollees with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Huang-Tz Ou; Bhramar Mukherjee; Steven R Erickson; John D Piette; Richard P Bagozzi; Rajesh Balkrishnan
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 2.459

9.  Case-mix adjusting performance measures in a veteran population: pharmacy- and diagnosis-based approaches.

Authors:  Chuan-Fen Liu; Anne E Sales; Nancy D Sharp; Paul Fishman; Kevin L Sloan; Jeff Todd-Stenberg; W Paul Nichol; Amy K Rosen; Susan Loveland
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Comparison of Rx-defined morbidity groups and diagnosis- based risk adjusters for predicting healthcare costs in Taiwan.

Authors:  Raymond Nc Kuo; Mei-Shu Lai
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.