RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance (MR) is limited by artifacts in vessels after stenting. An active MR imaging stent (AMRIS) allows for artifact-free imaging with local improvement in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In a rabbit model, we evaluated the imaging properties by MR angiography (MRA) and flow measurements. METHODS: The AMRIS was placed in the abdominal aorta of five rabbits. At 1.5 T, MRA (three-dimensional fast low-angle shot) was performed before and after intravenous injection of an iron oxide-based, blood-pool contrast medium (dose, 50 micromol Fe/kg), and flow measurements were performed (electrocardiographically triggered phase-contrast cine gradient-echo sequence). Mean SNRs were calculated and flow volume curves were generated. RESULTS: The SNR was 6.0 +/- 0.6 (outside the stent) versus 12.3 +/- 1.1 (inside the stent, P < 0.05) for plain MRA, 21.2 +/- 0.6 versus 40.6 +/- 5.2 (P < 0.05) for contrast-enhanced MRA, and 5.4 +/- 0.4 versus 13.7 +/- 2.1 (P < 0.05) for the magnitude images of flow measurements. Flow volume curves within and distal to the stent were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: By using the AMRIS as a vascular stent, the stented vessel segment can be examined with enhanced signal intensity on MRI.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Magnetic resonance (MR) is limited by artifacts in vessels after stenting. An active MR imaging stent (AMRIS) allows for artifact-free imaging with local improvement in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In a rabbit model, we evaluated the imaging properties by MR angiography (MRA) and flow measurements. METHODS: The AMRIS was placed in the abdominal aorta of five rabbits. At 1.5 T, MRA (three-dimensional fast low-angle shot) was performed before and after intravenous injection of an iron oxide-based, blood-pool contrast medium (dose, 50 micromol Fe/kg), and flow measurements were performed (electrocardiographically triggered phase-contrast cine gradient-echo sequence). Mean SNRs were calculated and flow volume curves were generated. RESULTS: The SNR was 6.0 +/- 0.6 (outside the stent) versus 12.3 +/- 1.1 (inside the stent, P < 0.05) for plain MRA, 21.2 +/- 0.6 versus 40.6 +/- 5.2 (P < 0.05) for contrast-enhanced MRA, and 5.4 +/- 0.4 versus 13.7 +/- 2.1 (P < 0.05) for the magnitude images of flow measurements. Flow volume curves within and distal to the stent were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: By using the AMRIS as a vascular stent, the stented vessel segment can be examined with enhanced signal intensity on MRI.
Authors: Kanishka Ratnayaka; Anthony Z Faranesh; Michael A Guttman; Ozgur Kocaturk; Christina E Saikus; Robert J Lederman Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2008-12-29 Impact factor: 5.364