Literature DB >> 11606807

Dosimetry modeling of inhaled formaldehyde: binning nasal flux predictions for quantitative risk assessment.

J S Kimbell1, J H Overton, R P Subramaniam, P M Schlosser, K T Morgan, R B Conolly, F J Miller.   

Abstract

Interspecies extrapolations of tissue dose and tumor response have been a significant source of uncertainty in formaldehyde cancer risk assessment. The ability to account for species-specific variation of dose within the nasal passages would reduce this uncertainty. Three-dimensional, anatomically realistic, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models of nasal airflow and formaldehyde gas transport in the F344 rat, rhesus monkey, and human were used to predict local patterns of wall mass flux (pmol/[mm(2)-h-ppm]). The nasal surface of each species was partitioned by flux into smaller regions (flux bins), each characterized by surface area and an average flux value. Rat and monkey flux bins were predicted for steady-state inspiratory airflow rates corresponding to the estimated minute volume for each species. Human flux bins were predicted for steady-state inspiratory airflow at 7.4, 15, 18, 25.8, 31.8, and 37 l/min and were extrapolated to 46 and 50 l/min. Flux values higher than half the maximum flux value (flux median) were predicted for nearly 20% of human nasal surfaces at 15 l/min, whereas only 5% of rat and less than 1% of monkey nasal surfaces were associated with fluxes higher than flux medians at 0.576 l/min and 4.8 l/min, respectively. Human nasal flux patterns shifted distally and uptake percentage decreased as inspiratory flow rate increased. Flux binning captures anatomical effects on flux and is thereby a basis for describing the effects of anatomy and airflow on local tissue disposition and distributions of tissue response. Formaldehyde risk models that incorporate flux binning derived from anatomically realistic CFD models will have significantly reduced uncertainty compared with risk estimates based on default methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11606807     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/64.1.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  13 in total

1.  Identifying an indoor air exposure limit for formaldehyde considering both irritation and cancer hazards.

Authors:  Robert Golden
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 5.635

2.  Distribution of DNA adducts caused by inhaled formaldehyde is consistent with induction of nasal carcinoma but not leukemia.

Authors:  Kun Lu; Leonard B Collins; Hongyu Ru; Edilberto Bermudez; James A Swenberg
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Comparative Risks of Aldehyde Constituents in Cigarette Smoke Using Transient Computational Fluid Dynamics/Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models of the Rat and Human Respiratory Tracts.

Authors:  Richard A Corley; Senthil Kabilan; Andrew P Kuprat; James P Carson; Richard E Jacob; Kevin R Minard; Justin G Teeguarden; Charles Timchalk; Sudhakar Pipavath; Robb Glenny; Daniel R Einstein
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Alternative approaches for acute inhalation toxicity testing to address global regulatory and non-regulatory data requirements: An international workshop report.

Authors:  Amy J Clippinger; David Allen; Annie M Jarabek; Marco Corvaro; Marianna Gaça; Sean Gehen; Jon A Hotchkiss; Grace Patlewicz; Jodie Melbourne; Paul Hinderliter; Miyoung Yoon; Dongeun Huh; Anna Lowit; Barbara Buckley; Michael Bartels; Kelly BéruBé; Daniel M Wilson; Ian Indans; Mathieu Vinken
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 5.  Formaldehyde carcinogenicity research: 30 years and counting for mode of action, epidemiology, and cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  James A Swenberg; Benjamin C Moeller; Kun Lu; Julia E Rager; Rebecca C Fry; Thomas B Starr
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 1.902

6.  Persistent rhinitis and epithelial remodeling induced by cyclic ozone exposure in the nasal airways of infant monkeys.

Authors:  Stephan A Carey; Carol A Ballinger; Charles G Plopper; Ruth J McDonald; Alfred A Bartolucci; Edward M Postlethwait; Jack R Harkema
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 5.464

7.  Effects of Surface Smoothness on Inertial Particle Deposition in Human Nasal Models.

Authors:  Jeffry D Schroeter; Guilherme J M Garcia; Julia S Kimbell
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.433

8.  Uncertainties in biologically-based modeling of formaldehyde-induced respiratory cancer risk: identification of key issues.

Authors:  Ravi P Subramaniam; Chao Chen; Kenny S Crump; Danielle Devoney; John F Fox; Christopher J Portier; Paul M Schlosser; Chad M Thompson; Paul White
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2008-06-28       Impact factor: 4.000

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations of rabbit nasal airflows for the development of hybrid CFD/PBPK models.

Authors:  R A Corley; K R Minard; S Kabilan; D R Einstein; A P Kuprat; J R Harkema; J S Kimbell; M L Gargas; John H Kinzell
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Comparative computational modeling of airflows and vapor dosimetry in the respiratory tracts of rat, monkey, and human.

Authors:  Richard A Corley; Senthil Kabilan; Andrew P Kuprat; James P Carson; Kevin R Minard; Richard E Jacob; Charles Timchalk; Robb Glenny; Sudhakar Pipavath; Timothy Cox; Christopher D Wallis; Richard F Larson; Michelle V Fanucchi; Edward M Postlethwait; Daniel R Einstein
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.