Literature DB >> 11606797

Alternative models for carcinogenicity testing.

S M Cohen1, D Robinson, J MacDonald.   

Abstract

The International Conference on Harmonisation Expert Working Group on Safety suggested that under certain circumstances, data from alternative assays could be used in safety evaluation in place of a second bioassay. Several alternatives were discussed. Six of these models were evaluated in a collaborative effort under the auspices of the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) branch of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI). Standard protocols, pathology review, and statistical evaluations were developed. Twenty-one chemicals were evaluated, including genotoxic, nongenotoxic, carcinogenic, and noncarcinogenic chemicals. The models that were evaluated included the p53(+/-) heterozygous knockout mouse, the rasH2 transgenic mouse, the TgAC transgenic mouse (dermal and oral administration), the homozygous XPA knockout and the XPA/p53 knockout mouse models. Also evaluated were the neonatal mouse models and the Syrian Hamster Embryo (SHE) transformation assay. The results of this comprehensive study suggest that some of these models might be useful in hazard identification if used in conjunction with information from other sources in a weight of evidence, integrated analysis approach to risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11606797     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/64.1.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  7 in total

1.  Power, expertise and the limits of representative democracy: genetics as scientific progress or political legitimation in carcinogenic risk assessment of pharmaceuticals?

Authors:  John Abraham; Rachel Ballinger
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-07-20

Review 2.  The use of genetically modified mice in cancer risk assessment: challenges and limitations.

Authors:  David A Eastmond; Suryanarayana V Vulimiri; John E French; Babasaheb Sonawane
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  Science, politics, and health in the brave new world of pharmaceutical carcinogenic risk assessment: technical progress or cycle of regulatory capture?

Authors:  John Abraham; Rachel Ballinger
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 4.  ILSI Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI), global leader in advancing translational science to create science-based solutions for a sustainable, healthier world.

Authors:  Ayako Takei
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2015-06-16

Review 5.  rasH2 mouse: reproducibility and stability of carcinogenicity due to a standardized production and monitoring system.

Authors:  Hideki Tsutsumi; Ryo Inoue; Masahiko Yasuda; Riichi Takahashi; Masami Suzuki; Koji Urano
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 1.628

6.  Survey of tumorigenic sensitivity in 6-month rasH2-Tg mice studies compared with 2-year rodent assays.

Authors:  Shigeru Hisada; Kenjiro Tsubota; Kenji Inoue; Hisaharu Yamada; Takanori Ikeda; Frank D Sistare
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 1.628

7.  Creation and preliminary characterization of a Tp53 knockout rat.

Authors:  Aaron McCoy; Cynthia L Besch-Williford; Craig L Franklin; Edward J Weinstein; Xiaoxia Cui
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 5.758

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.