Literature DB >> 11605926

Comparison of two different temperature maintenance strategies during open abdominal surgery: upper body forced-air warming versus whole body water garment.

P K Janicki1, M S Higgins, J Janssen, R F Johnson, C Beattie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A new system has been developed that circulates warm water through a whole body garment worn by the patient during surgery. In this study the authors compared two different strategies for the maintenance of intraoperative normothermia. One strategy used a new water garment warming system that permitted active warming of both the upper and lower extremities and the back. The other strategy used a single (upper body) forced-air warming system.
METHODS: In this prospective, randomized study, 53 adult patients were enrolled in one of two intraoperative temperature management groups during open abdominal surgery with general anesthesia. The water-garment group (n = 25) received warming with a body temperature (rectal) set point of 36.8 degrees C. The forced-air-warmer group (n = 28) received routine warming therapy using upper body forced-air warming system (set on high). The ambient temperature in the operating room was maintained constant at approximately 20 degrees C. Rectal, distal esophageal, tympanic, forearm, and fingertip temperatures were recorded perioperatively and during 2 h after surgery. Extubated patients in both groups were assessed postoperatively for shivering, use of additional warming devices, and subjective thermal comfort.
RESULTS: The mean rectal and esophageal temperatures at incision, 1 h after incision, at skin closure, and immediately postoperatively were significantly higher (0.4-0.6 degrees C) in the group that received water-garment warming when compared with the group that received upper body forced-air warming. The calculated 95% confidence intervals for the above differences in core temperatures were 0.7-0.1, 0.8-0.2, 0.8-0.2, and 0.9-0.1, retrospectively. In addition, 14 and 7% of patients in the control upper body forced-air group remained hypothermic (< 35.5 degrees C) 1 and 2 h after surgery, respectively. No core temperature less than 35.5 degrees C was observed perioperatively in any of the patients from the water-garment group. A similar frequency of the thermal stress events (shivering, use of additional warming devices, subjective thermal discomfort) was observed after extubation in both groups during the 2 h after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The investigated water warming system, by virtue of its ability to deliver heat to a greater percentage of the body, results in better maintenance of intraoperative normothermia that does forced-air warming applied only to the upper extremities, as is common practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11605926     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200110000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  7 in total

1.  Effects of a circulating-water garment and forced-air warming on body heat content and core temperature.

Authors:  Akiko Taguchi; Jebadurai Ratnaraj; Barbara Kabon; Neeru Sharma; Rainer Lenhardt; Daniel I Sessler; Andrea Kurz
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Water-filled garment warming of infants undergoing open abdominal or thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Michael R J Sury; Stephen Scuplak
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Comparing ambient, air-convection, and fluid-convection heating techniques in treating hypothermic burn patients, a clinical RCT.

Authors:  Britt-Marie Kjellman; Mats Fredrikson; Gunilla Glad-Mattsson; Folke Sjöberg; Fredrik Rm Huss
Journal:  Ann Surg Innov Res       Date:  2011-07-07

4.  Core temperatures during major abdominal surgery in patients warmed with new circulating-water garment, forced-air warming, or carbon-fiber resistive-heating system.

Authors:  Kenji Hasegawa; Chiharu Negishi; Fumitoshi Nakagawa; Makoto Ozaki
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 5.  Active body surface warming systems for preventing complications caused by inadvertent perioperative hypothermia in adults.

Authors:  Eva Madrid; Gerard Urrútia; Marta Roqué i Figuls; Hector Pardo-Hernandez; Juan Manuel Campos; Pilar Paniagua; Luz Maestre; Pablo Alonso-Coello
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-21

6.  Water warming garment versus forced air warming system in prevention of intraoperative hypothermia during liver transplantation: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN32154832].

Authors:  Piotr K Janicki; Cristina Stoica; William C Chapman; J Kelly Wright; Garry Walker; Ram Pai; Ann Walia; Mias Pretorius; C Wright Pinson
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2002-11-19       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Prevention of laparoscopic surgery induced hypothermia with warmed humidified insufflation: Is the experimental combination of a warming blanket synergistic?

Authors:  Eric Noll; Sophie Diemunsch; Julien Pottecher; Jean-Pierre Rameaux; Michele Diana; Eric Sauleau; Kurt Ruetzler; Pierre Diemunsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.