Literature DB >> 11605873

The dental arch form revisited.

H Noroozi1, T H Nik, R Saeeda.   

Abstract

Recently, the beta function has been shown to be an accurate mathematical model of the human dental arch. In this research, we tried to find the equation of a curve that would be similar to the generalized beta function curve and at the same time could represent tapered, ovoid, and square dental arches. A total of 23 sets of naturally well-aligned Class I casts were selected, and the depths and widths of the dental arches were measured at the canine and second molar regions. Using the mean depths and widths, functions in the form of Y = AXm + BXn were calculated that would pass through the central incisors, canines, and second molars. Each function was compared with the generalized beta function with the use of root mean square values. It was shown that the polynomial function Y = AX6 + BX2 was the nearest to the generalized beta function. Then the coordinates of the midincisal edges and buccal cusp tips of each dental arch were measured, and the correlation coefficient of each dental arch with its corresponding sixth order polynomial function was calculated. The results showed that the function Y = AX6 + BX2 could be an accurate substitute for the beta function in less common forms of the human dental arch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11605873     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2001)071<0386:TDAFR>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  13 in total

1.  [Analysis of the relationship among maxillary anterior teeth width, anterior arch perimeter and anterior segment depth].

Authors:  P Wang; D J Li; J Z Liu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-02-18

2.  Shape variation and covariation of upper and lower dental arches of an orthodontic population.

Authors:  Alexandros Papagiannis; Demetrios J Halazonetis
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Agreement of the clinician's choice of archwire selection on conventional and virtual models.

Authors:  Sahar Haddadpour; Saeed Reza Motamedian; Mohammad Behnaz; Sohrab Asefi; Alireza Akbarzadeh Bagheban; Amir Hossein Abdi; Mahtab Nouri
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Dermatoglyphic assessment in subjects with different dental arch forms: an appraisal.

Authors:  Shabina Sachdeva; Arvind Tripathi; Pranav Kapoor
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-10-17

5.  [Esthetic proportions of maxillary anterior teeth of 120 Chinese adults].

Authors:  W L Wu; X Zeng; X Q Liu; J G Tan
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-12-18

6.  New classification of lingual arch form in normal occlusion using three dimensional virtual models.

Authors:  Kyung Hee Park; Mohamed Bayome; Jae Hyun Park; Jeong Woo Lee; Seung-Hak Baek; Yoon-Ah Kook
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 1.372

7.  The relationship between tooth size discrepancy and archform classification in orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Gerard O'Mahony; Declan T Millett; Michael S Cronin; Grant T McIntyre; Mark K Barry
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-04-01

8.  Validity and reliability of a three-dimensional dental cast simulator for arch dimension measurements.

Authors:  Mahtab Nouri; Sohrab Asefi; Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban; Amin Aminian; Mohammad Shamsa; Reza Massudi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2014-11

9.  Comparison of arch forms between Turkish and North American.

Authors:  Ahmet A Celebi; Hakan Keklik; Enes Tan; Faruk I Ucar
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

10.  The effect of occlusogingival placement of clinical bracket points on the adaptation of a straight wire to the lingual arch form.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Abdi; Saeed Reza Motamedian; Ehsan Balaghi; Mahtab Nouri
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.