Literature DB >> 11605705

Satisfaction with information and quality of life in patients undergoing chemotherapy for cancer. The role of individual differences in information preference.

M Elf1, K Wikblad.   

Abstract

Earlier studies have shown that patients are dissatisfied with the information they receive from doctors and nurses. The purpose of this study was to analyze satisfaction with information and quality of life in patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, considering the patient's information preference. Data were collected during interviews with 30 consecutive patients undergoing chemotherapy for cancer. The subject of the interviews was the satisfaction of patients with the information they received, and additional measures used were the Miller Behavioral Styles Scale and EORTC-QLQ-30. The results showed that 21 of 30 patients were satisfied with the information they received from health care. Married patients or cohabitants were satisfied more often than single patients. No significant differences in quality of life could be found between satisfied and dissatisfied patients. Regarding information preferences, the dissatisfied patients reported more information-avoiding behavior than those who were satisfied. The results must be interpreted cautiously because of the study's limitations, but one clinical implication can be stated: There is value in being aware of patients' information-seeking/avoiding behavior before starting to inform them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11605705     DOI: 10.1097/00002820-200110000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Nurs        ISSN: 0162-220X            Impact factor:   2.592


  8 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring style of coping with cancer related threats: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Pagona Roussi; Suzanne M Miller
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-02-02

2.  Prognosis-Related Nutritional Score for Cancer Patients (PRNS): a clinical nutritional score derived from a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Bingdong Zhang; Yuerui Li; Yongbing Chen
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 8.440

Review 3.  Symptom evaluation in reflux disease: workshop background, processes, terminology, recommendations, and discussion outputs.

Authors:  J Dent; D Armstrong; B Delaney; P Moayyedi; N J Talley; N Vakil
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Antecedent characteristics of online cancer information seeking among rural breast cancer patients: an application of the Cognitive-Social Health Information Processing (C-SHIP) model.

Authors:  Bret R Shaw; Lori L Dubenske; Jeong Yeob Han; Ludmila Cofta-Woerpel; Nigel Bush; David H Gustafson; Fiona McTavish
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2008-06

5.  Role of clinical oncology pharmacist in determination of pharmaceutical care needs in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Songül Tezcan; Fikret Vehbi İzzettin; Mesut Sancar; Nazım Serdar Turhal; Perran Fulden Yumuk
Journal:  Eur J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-03-10

6.  Pharmaceutical care for patients with breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Andrea Liekweg; Martina Westfeld; Michael Braun; Oliver Zivanovic; Tania Schink; Walther Kuhn; Ulrich Jaehde
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  The relation between information provision and health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: a systematic review.

Authors:  O Husson; F Mols; L V van de Poll-Franse
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Medication-related Self-management Behaviors among Arthritis Patients: Does Attentional Coping Style Matter?

Authors:  Lorie L Geryk; Susan J Blalock; Robert F DeVellis; Joanne M Jordan; Paul K J Han; Delesha M Carpenter
Journal:  Open Rheumatol J       Date:  2016-09-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.