Literature DB >> 11605631

Growth responses of cartilage to static and dynamic compression.

K W Li1, A K Williamson, A S Wang, R L Sah.   

Abstract

During skeletal development, growth, and maturation, gradual changes in the material properties and physical dimensions of cartilage occur under the influence of mechanical loading. The objective of the current study was to compare glycosaminoglyean biosynthesis and cell proliferation in fetal, calf, and adult bovine cartilage explants, isolated from defined depths from the articular surface, in response to controlled compressive loads. Mechanical testing confirmed that for all cartilage samples subjected to load, there was a marked time-averaged (static) compression, whereas the addition of dynamic load at a frequency of 0.01 Hz induced dynamic strain with amplitude and phase shift characteristics typical of stimuli that previously were found to be associated with stimulation of glycosaminoglycan synthesis. In metabolic studies, the application of static loading (84 kPa) for 24 hours inhibited glycosaminoglycan and deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in all cultured cartilage samples. The superposition of dynamic loading (200 kPa, 0.01 Hz) induced a 20% stimulation of glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis in calf cartilage from the middle-deep zones over statically-loaded samples and an additional approximate 50% suppression of deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis in fetal and calf cartilage from the articular surface. These results indicate that synthesis of glycosaminoglycan and deoxyribonucleic acid, two distinct indices of cartilage growth, are regulated independently by mechanical loading and that cartilage responds differently to static and dynamic loading at different stages of maturation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11605631     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200110001-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  8 in total

1.  A novel bioreactor for the dynamic stimulation and mechanical evaluation of multiple tissue-engineered constructs.

Authors:  Trevor J Lujan; Kyle M Wirtz; Chelsea S Bahney; Steven M Madey; Brian Johnstone; Michael Bottlang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 3.056

2.  The regional sensitivity of chondrocyte gene expression to coactive mechanical load and exogenous TNF-α stimuli.

Authors:  S L Bevill; K A Boyer; T P Andriacchi
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  In vitro organ culture of the bovine intervertebral disc: effects of vertebral endplate and potential for mechanobiology studies.

Authors:  Cynthia R Lee; James C Iatridis; Lucy Poveda; Mauro Alini
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  The dynamic mechanical environment of the chondrocyte: a biphasic finite element model of cell-matrix interactions under cyclic compressive loading.

Authors:  Eunjung Kim; Farshid Guilak; Mansoor A Haider
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Mature runt cow lumbar intradiscal pressures and motion segment biomechanics.

Authors:  Glenn Robin Buttermann; Brian P Beaubien; Louis C Saeger
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 6.  Signal transduction by mechanical strain in chondrocytes.

Authors:  James Deschner; Cynthia R Hofman; Nicholas P Piesco; Sudha Agarwal
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.294

7.  The role of hydrogel structure and dynamic loading on chondrocyte gene expression and matrix formation.

Authors:  G D Nicodemus; S J Bryant
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  Role of mitochondria in mediating chondrocyte response to mechanical stimuli.

Authors:  Yuchen He; Meagan J Makarczyk; Hang Lin
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 5.037

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.