Literature DB >> 11604611

The outcome of failed free flaps in head and neck and extremity reconstruction: what is next in the reconstructive ladder?

F C Wei1, F Demirkan, H C Chen, D C Chuang, S H Chen, C H Lin, S L Cheng, M H Cheng, Y T Lin.   

Abstract

The indications for free flaps have been more or less clarified; however, the course of reconstruction after the failure of a free flap remains undetermined. Is it better to insist on one's initial choice, or should surgeons downgrade their reconstructive goals? To establish a preliminary guideline, this study was designed to retrospectively analyze the outcome of failed free-tissue transfers performed in the authors hospital. Over the past 8 years (1990 through 1997), 3361 head and neck and extremity reconstructions were performed by free-tissue transfers, excluding toe transplantations. Among these reconstructions, 1235 flaps (36.7 percent) were transferred to the head and neck region, and 2126 flaps (63.3 percent) to the extremities. A total of 101 failures (3.0 percent total plus the partial failure rate) were encountered. Forty-two failures occurred in the head and neck region, and 59 in the extremities. Evaluation of the cases revealed that one of three following approaches to handling the failure was taken: (1) a second free-tissue transfer; (2) a regional flap transfer; or (3) conservative management with debridement, wound care, and subsequent closure by secondary intention, whether by local flaps or skin grafting. In the head and neck region, 17 second free flaps (40 percent) and 15 regional flaps (36 percent) were transferred to salvage the reconstruction, whereas conservative management was undertaken in the remaining 10 cases (24 percent). In the extremities, 37 failures were treated conservatively (63 percent) in addition to 17 second free flaps (29 percent) and three regional flaps (5 percent) used to salvage the failed reconstruction. Two cases underwent amputation (3 percent). The average time elapsed between the failure and second free-tissue transfer was 12 days (range, 2 to 60 days) in the head and neck region and 18 days (range, 2 to 56 days) in the extremities. In a total of 34 second free-tissue transfers at both localizations, there were only three failures (9 percent). However, in the head and neck region, seven of the regional flaps transferred (47 percent) and four cases that were conservatively treated (40 percent) either failed or developed complications that lengthened the reconstruction period because of additional procedures. Six other free-tissue transfers had to be performed to manage these complicated cases. Conservative management was quite successful in the extremities; most patients' wounds healed, although more than one skin-graft procedure was required in 10 patients (27 percent). In conclusion, a second free-tissue transfer is, in general, a relatively more reliable and more effective procedure for the treatment of flap failure in the head and neck region, as well as failed vascularized bone flaps in the reconstruction of the extremities. Conservative treatment may be a simple and valid alternative to second (free) flaps for soft-tissue coverage in extremities with partial and even total losses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11604611     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200110000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  31 in total

1.  Bone flap perfusion assessment using near-infrared fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  John T Nguyen; Yoshitomo Ashitate; Ian A Buchanan; Ahmed M S Ibrahim; Sylvain Gioux; Priti P Patel; John V Frangioni; Bernard T Lee
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Is tissue augmentation a reality in biosurgery? An experimental study of endothelial cell invasion into tissue filler.

Authors:  Tomaz Velnar; Vladimir Smrkolj; Marjan Slak Rupnik; Lidija Gradisnik
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Principles of head and neck reconstruction: an algorithm to guide flap selection.

Authors:  Harvey Chim; Christopher J Salgado; Rimante Seselgyte; Fu-Chan Wei; Samir Mardini
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Complications of head and neck reconstruction and their treatment.

Authors:  Bien-Keem Tan; Yong-Chen Por; Hung-Chi Chen
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Recipient Vessel Selection in Head and Neck Reconstruction Based on the Type of Neck Dissection.

Authors:  Shunjiro Yagi; Yoshiko Suyama; Kohei Fukuoka; Hiromi Takeuchi; Hiroya Kitano
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 1.641

6.  Postoperative care and monitoring of the reconstructed head and neck patient.

Authors:  Christopher J Salgado; Harvey Chim; Shayla Schoenoff; Samir Mardini
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.314

7.  Near-infrared imaging of face transplants: are both pedicles necessary?

Authors:  John T Nguyen; Yoshitomo Ashitate; Vivek Venugopal; Florin Neacsu; Frank Kettenring; John V Frangioni; Sylvain Gioux; Bernard T Lee
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  [Ischemic preconditioning in a rat adipocutaneous flap model].

Authors:  A Dacho; S Lyutenski; G Aust; A Dietz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 9.  Free flap transfer in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a review of the current data.

Authors:  M Thorwarth; C Eulzer; R Bader; C Wolf; M Schmidt; S Schultze-Mosgau
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-09

10.  End-to-end versus end-to-side venous microanastomoses in head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  Cesare Piazza; Valentina Taglietti; Alberto Paderno; Piero Nicolai
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.