Literature DB >> 11603957

IPCS conceptual framework for evaluating a mode of action for chemical carcinogenesis.

C Sonich-Mullin1, R Fielder, J Wiltse, K Baetcke, J Dempsey, P Fenner-Crisp, D Grant, M Hartley, A Knaap, D Kroese, I Mangelsdorf, E Meek, J M Rice, M Younes.   

Abstract

The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) is leading an activity to harmonize approaches to cancer risk assessment as a part of its larger project on the Harmonization of Approaches to the Assessment of Risk from Exposure to Chemicals. Through a series of workshops and the evaluation of case studies, a number of key components of risk assessments relating to harmonization were identified: transparency, terminology, weight of evidence, flexibility, and accessibility/communication. A major impediment to harmonization identified in the consideration of weight of evidence was the evaluation of mode of action. To address this need, a conceptual framework was developed, based on the general principles involved in considering the chemical induction of a specific tumor in animals. This is based partly on the Bradford Hill criteria for causality as modified by Faustman et al. (1997) for developmental toxicity. The framework is described in this paper followed by a worked example. It is recognized that the framework addresses only one stage in the overall characterization of hazard to humans of chemical carcinogens. Another important but separate step is the assessment of relevance to humans. This is a priority area for future work in this project. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11603957     DOI: 10.1006/rtph.2001.1493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  43 in total

Review 1.  Case examples of an evaluation of the human relevance of the pyrethroids/pyrethrins-induced liver tumours in rodents based on the mode of action.

Authors:  Tomoya Yamada
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Screening for human urinary bladder carcinogens: two-year bioassay is unnecessary.

Authors:  Samuel M Cohen
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  Application of a combined aggregate exposure pathway and adverse outcome pathway (AEP-AOP) approach to inform a cumulative risk assessment: A case study with phthalates.

Authors:  Rebecca A Clewell; Jeremy A Leonard; Chantel I Nicolas; Jerry L Campbell; Miyoung Yoon; Alina Y Efremenko; Patrick D McMullen; Melvin E Andersen; Harvey J Clewell; Katherine A Phillips; Yu-Mei Tan
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  High-content imaging of 3D-cultured neural stem cells on a 384-pillar plate for the assessment of cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Pranav Joshi; Soo-Yeon Kang; Kyeong-Nam Yu; Chandrasekhar Kothapalli; Moo-Yeal Lee
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 5.  Assessment of the mode of action underlying development of rodent small intestinal tumors following oral exposure to hexavalent chromium and relevance to humans.

Authors:  Chad M Thompson; Deborah M Proctor; Mina Suh; Laurie C Haws; Christopher R Kirman; Mark A Harris
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.635

6.  Perspectives on validation of high-throughput assays supporting 21st century toxicity testing.

Authors:  Richard Judson; Robert Kavlock; Matthew Martin; David Reif; Keith Houck; Thomas Knudsen; Ann Richard; Raymond R Tice; Maurice Whelan; Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Christopher Austin; George Daston; Thomas Hartung; John R Fowle; William Wooge; Weida Tong; David Dix
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.043

Review 7.  The PPARα-dependent rodent liver tumor response is not relevant to humans: addressing misconceptions.

Authors:  J Christopher Corton; Jeffrey M Peters; James E Klaunig
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  The Key Events Dose-Response Framework: a cross-disciplinary mode-of-action based approach to examining dose-response and thresholds.

Authors:  Elizabeth Julien; Alan R Boobis; Stephen S Olin
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.176

9.  Application of key events analysis to chemical carcinogens and noncarcinogens.

Authors:  Alan R Boobis; George P Daston; R Julian Preston; Stephen S Olin
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.176

10.  The Key Events Dose-Response Framework: its potential for application to foodborne pathogenic microorganisms.

Authors:  Robert L Buchanan; Arie H Havelaar; Mary Alice Smith; Richard C Whiting; Elizabeth Julien
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.