Literature DB >> 11603907

Recurrent ischaemia during continuous multilead ST-segment monitoring identifies patients with acute coronary syndromes at high risk of adverse cardiac events; meta-analysis of three studies involving 995 patients.

K M Akkerhuis1, P A Klootwijk, W Lindeboom, V A Umans, S Meij, P P Kint, M L Simoons.   

Abstract

AIMS: Recurrent ischaemia, detected by continuous ECG monitoring, in patients with unstable angina increases the risk of unfavourable outcome. Studies that evaluated this relationship have been limited by the small series of patients. By combining data from three studies, the present analysis aims to provide an accurate assessment of the impact of recurrent ischaemia detected by multilead ECG-ischaemia monitoring on the occurrence of death and myocardial infarction in patients with acute coronary syndromes. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Data were obtained from CAPTURE, PURSUIT and FROST, three trials evaluating glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Patients were monitored for 24 h after enrollment with a computer-assisted 12-lead or a vectorcardiographic ECG-ischaemia monitoring device. In a retrospective blinded analysis, recurrent ischaemic episodes were identified by a computer algorithm. The number of ischaemic episodes was normalized to 24 h. Ischaemic episodes were detected in 271 (27%) of 995 patients. There was a direct proportional relationship between the number of ischaemic episodes per 24 h and the probability of cardiac events at 5 and 30 days. The 30-day composite of death and myocardial infarction occurred in 5.7% of patients without episodes and increased to 19.7% in patients with >/=5 episodes. After adjustment for baseline predictors of adverse outcome, the relative risk of death or myocardial infarction at 5 and 30 days increased by 25% for each additional ischaemic episode per 24 h.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis emphasizes the need for integration of multilead ECG-ischaemia monitoring systems in coronary care units and emergency wards to improve early risk stratification in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Copyright 2001 The European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11603907     DOI: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  9 in total

Review 1.  ST-segment analysis in ambulatory ECG (AECG or Holter) monitoring in patients with coronary artery disease: clinical significance and analytic techniques.

Authors:  Peter H Stone
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 2.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of ambulatory ECG (Holter) monitoring in patients with coronary heart disease: a review.

Authors:  C Michael Gibson; Lauren N Ciaglo; Matthew C Southard; Shaun Takao; Caitlin Harrigan; Jason Lewis; Jason Filopei; Michelle Lew; Sabina A Murphy; Jacqueline Buros
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  [Acute coronary syndrome in the prehospital phase].

Authors:  J-H Schiff; H R Arntz; B W Böttiger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Does continuous ST-segment monitoring add prognostic information to the TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores?

Authors:  Pedro Carmo; Jorge Ferreira; Carlos Aguiar; António Ferreira; Luís Raposo; Pedro Gonçalves; João Brito; Aniceto Silva
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Association of Implementation of Practice Standards for Electrocardiographic Monitoring With Nurses' Knowledge, Quality of Care, and Patient Outcomes: Findings From the Practical Use of the Latest Standards of Electrocardiography (PULSE) Trial.

Authors:  Marjorie Funk; Kristopher P Fennie; Kimberly E Stephens; Jeanine L May; Catherine G Winkler; Barbara J Drew
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-02

6.  Among Unstable Angina and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients, Transient Myocardial Ischemia and Early Invasive Treatment Are Predictors of Major In-hospital Complications.

Authors:  Michele M Pelter; Denise L Loranger; Teri M Kozik; Anita Kedia; Richard P Ganchan; Deborah Ganchan; Xiao Hu; Mary G Carey
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.083

7.  Contrast agent dose and slow/no-reflow in percutaneous coronary interventions : A case-control study of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  S Ding; Y Shi; X Sun; Q Cao; H Dai; J Guan
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 8.  Criteria of the German Society of Cardiology for the establishment of chest pain units: update 2014.

Authors:  Felix Post; Tommaso Gori; Evangelos Giannitsis; Harald Darius; Stephan Baldus; Christian Hamm; Rainer Hambrecht; Hans Martin Hofmeister; Hugo Katus; Stefan Perings; Jochen Senges; Thomas Münzel
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  ANMCO-SIMEU Consensus Document: in-hospital management of patients presenting with chest pain.

Authors:  Guerrino Zuin; Vito Maurizio Parato; Paolo Groff; Michele Massimo Gulizia; Andrea Di Lenarda; Matteo Cassin; Gian Alfonso Cibinel; Maurizio Del Pinto; Giuseppe Di Tano; Federico Nardi; Roberta Rossini; Maria Pia Ruggieri; Enrico Ruggiero; Fortunato Scotto di Uccio; Serafina Valente
Journal:  Eur Heart J Suppl       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 1.803

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.