Literature DB >> 11603634

Views on involving a social support person during labor in Zambian maternities.

M C Maimbolwa1, N Sikazwe, B Yamba, V Diwan, A B Ransjö-Arvidson.   

Abstract

Because social support persons are excluded from modern obstetric care in Zambia, the aim of this study was to explore the views of 84 mothers and 40 health staff about allowing women to be attended by a supportive companion during labor in Zambian urban and rural maternities. Most of the mothers wanted a companion present to provide emotional and practical support. Those who were opposed to the idea had nobody to ask to be with them, or they had relatives who would interfere with the care provided. All health staff cited hospital policy as the principal reason for prohibiting social support persons from staying with laboring women. They also said that the health staff's role is to care for laboring women, and they worried that social support persons could interfere with their work by giving the laboring women traditional medicine. However, most health staff also said that a social support person could help the laboring women and give her a sense of security. The study concludes that Zambian maternity staff should be exposed to new research findings about the benefits of social support during childbirth and that this practice should be encouraged in Zambia. Ultimately, it should be the laboring woman who decides whether she wants to bring a social support person to the labor ward.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11603634     DOI: 10.1016/s1526-9523(01)00134-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  8 in total

1.  Association between newborn separation, maternal consent and health outcomes: findings from a longitudinal survey in Kenya.

Authors:  Michelle Kao Nakphong; Emma Sacks; James Opot; May Sudhinaraset
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  The Role of Demand Factors in Utilization of Professional Care during Childbirth: Perspectives from Yemen.

Authors:  Annica Kempe; Fatoom Noor-Aldin Alwazer; Töres Theorell
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-09-18

3.  Is the policy of allowing a female labor companion feasible in developing countries? Results from a cross sectional study among Sri Lankan practitioners.

Authors:  Hemantha Senanayake; Rajitha Dilhan Wijesinghe; Kesavan Rajasekharan Nayar
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Birth companionship in a government health system: a pilot study in Kigoma, Tanzania.

Authors:  Paul Chaote; Nguke Mwakatundu; Sunday Dominico; Alex Mputa; Agnes Mbanza; Magdalena Metta; Samantha Lobis; Michelle Dynes; Selemani Mbuyita; Shanon McNab; Karen Schmidt; Florina Serbanescu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Effect of the presence of support person and routine intervention for women during childbirth in Isfahan, Iran: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Zahra Shahshahan; Ferdose Mehrabian; Shaghyegh Mashoori
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2014-07-31

6.  Association between social support and place of delivery: a cross-sectional study in Kericho, Western Kenya.

Authors:  Mayo Ono; Akiko Matsuyama; Mohamed Karama; Sumihisa Honda
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 7.  Companion of choice at birth: factors affecting implementation.

Authors:  Tamar Kabakian-Khasholian; Anayda Portela
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Companionship during facility-based childbirth: results from a mixed-methods study with recently delivered women and providers in Kenya.

Authors:  Patience Afulani; Caroline Kusi; Leah Kirumbi; Dilys Walker
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.