Literature DB >> 11603533

Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Five-year follow-up.

B M Jolles1, F Porchet, N Theumann.   

Abstract

We carried out a retrospective review of 155 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who had been treated surgically and followed up regularly: 77 were evaluated at a mean of 6.5 years (5 to 8) after surgery by two independent observers. The outcome was assessed using the scoring system of Roland and Morris, and the rating system of Prolo, Oklund and Butcher. Instability was determined according to the criteria described by White and Panjabi. A significant decrease in low back pain and disability was seen. An excellent or good outcome was noted in 79% of patients; 9% showed secondary radiological instability. Surgical decompression is a safe and efficient procedure. In the absence of preoperative radiological evidence of instability, fusion is not required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11603533     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b7.11722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  13 in total

1.  Minimally invasive laminectomy in spondylolisthetic lumbar stenosis.

Authors:  Ilias N Caralopoulos; Cuong J Bui
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2014

2.  Decompression versus decompression and fusion for degenerative lumbar stenosis: analysis of the factors influencing the outcome of back pain and disability.

Authors:  Pasquale Donnarumma; Roberto Tarantino; Lorenzo Nigro; Marika Rullo; Domenico Messina; Daniele Diacinti; Roberto Delfini
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-03

3.  Clinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jwo-Luen Pao; Wein-Chin Chen; Po-Quang Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  LumbSten: the lumbar spinal stenosis outcome study.

Authors:  Johann Steurer; Alexander Nydegger; Ulrike Held; Florian Brunner; Jürg Hodler; François Porchet; Kan Min; Anne F Mannion; Beat Michel
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Neuropathic pain in elderly patients with chronic low back painand effects of pregabalin: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Yoshihito Sakai; Kenyu Ito; Tetsuro Hida; Sadayuki Ito; Atsushi Harada
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-04-15

6.  The efficacy of physical therapy and physical therapy plus calcitonin in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Fusun Sahin; Figen Yilmaz; Nurdan Kotevoglu; Banu Kuran
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Minimum 3-year outcomes in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis after bilateral microdecompression by unilateral or bilateral laminotomy.

Authors:  Sang-Mi Yang; Hyung-Ki Park; Jae-Chil Chang; Ra-Sun Kim; Sukh-Que Park; Sung-Jin Cho
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-09-30

8.  The Prolo Scale: history, evolution and psychometric properties.

Authors:  Carla Vanti; Donatella Prosperi; Marco Boschi
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-05-10

9.  A double-blind, randomized controlled, prospective trial assessing the effectiveness of oral corticoids in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar canal stenosis.

Authors:  Luiz Claudio L Rodrigues; Jamil Natour
Journal:  J Negat Results Biomed       Date:  2014-08-07

10.  A morphometric study of the lumbar spinous process in the Chinese population.

Authors:  B Cai; B Ran; Q Li; Z H Li; F N Li; M Li; W J Yan
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.