Literature DB >> 11603430

Significance of lymphangiosis carcinomatosa at the bronchial resection margin in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

B Passlick1, I Sitar, W Sienel, O Thetter, A Morresi-Hauf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for patients with microscopic residual disease at the bronchial margin (R1-resection) after resection for non-small cell lung cancer include observation, radiotherapy, reoperation, or even systemic therapy. The present study was performed to identify a parameter that would estimate the prognosis of these patients more precisely to permit a well-founded treatment recommendation for the individual patient.
METHODS: A total of 1,162 patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer were analyzed in this retrospective study. Fifty-four patients (4.6%) had R1-resections at the bronchial margin. Type of residual disease (mucosal, extramucosal, or involvement of the entire bronchial wall) and occurrence of tumor cells in the lymphatic vessels (lymphangiosis carcinomatosa) were recorded as distinct parameters and analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses (Log rank test; Cox regression model).
RESULTS: Lymphangiosis carcinomatosa at the bronchial margin was detected in 22 patients (40.7%) and was associated with a significantly shortened survival (median survival with lymphangiosis carcinomatosa, 13.3 months; without lymphangiosis carcinomatosa, 20.1 months; p = 0.026). Early stage patients (stage I-II) without lymphangiosis carcinomatosa showed a median survival of 49 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that lymphangiosis carcinomatosa at the resection margin is an independent prognostic parameter (p = 0.038). Even after postoperative radiotherapy the prognosis was still poor if a lymphangiosis carcinomatosa was detected (median survival, 17.1 months). All other parameters (T-stage, N-stage, tumor histology, type of bronchial wall involvement) were not of prognostic significance in R1-resected patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Lymphangiosis carcinomatosa at the bronchial resection margin predicts a poor prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. It is more than questionable whether these patients would benefit from local treatment options like radiotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11603430     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03067-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnostic imaging of pulmonary lymphangiosis carcinomatosis].

Authors:  B Rehbock; H-G Hieckel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  [Indications and limitations of fresh frozen sections in the pulmonary apparatus].

Authors:  K Pütz; M Engels; C Vollbrecht; L C Heukamp; A C Adam; R Büttner
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.011

3.  [Pathological-anatomical diagnosis according to the German lung cancer guideline 2018].

Authors:  K Junker; R Büttner; T Langer; D Ukena
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  [Application and interpretation of the R classification for lung cancer : Results of a survey of certified lung cancer centers].

Authors:  H Hoffmann; K Junker; C Kugler; P A Schnabel; A Warth
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  Prevalence, Prognostic Implications, and Survival Modulators of Incompletely Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the U.S. National Cancer Data Base.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Chun Chieh Lin; Matthew P Smeltzer; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 6.  Prognostic factors in resected lung carcinomas.

Authors:  Keith M Kerr; Marianne C Nicolson
Journal:  EJC Suppl       Date:  2013-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.