Literature DB >> 11602594

Gbetagamma affinity for bovine rhodopsin is determined by the carboxyl-terminal sequences of the gamma subunit.

X Jian1, W A Clark, J Kowalak, S P Markey, W F Simonds, J K Northup.   

Abstract

Two native betagamma dimers, beta(1)gamma(1) and beta(1)gamma(2), display very different affinities for receptors. Since these gamma subunits differ in both primary structure and isoprenoid modification, we examined the relative contributions of each to Gbetagamma interaction with receptors. We constructed baculoviruses encoding gamma(1) and gamma(2) subunits with altered CAAX (where A is an aliphatic amino acid) motifs to direct alternate or no prenylation of the gamma chains and a set of gamma(1) and gamma(2) chimeras with the gamma(2) CAAX motif at the carboxyl terminus. All the gamma constructs coexpressed with beta(1) in Sf9 cells yielded beta(1)gamma dimers, which were purified to near homogeneity, and their affinities for receptors and Galpha were quantitatively determined. Whereas alteration of the isoprenoid of gamma(1) from farnesyl to geranylgeranyl and of gamma(2) from geranylgeranyl to farnesyl had no impact on the affinities of beta(1)gamma dimers for Galpha(t), the non-prenylated beta(1)gamma(2) dimer had significantly diminished affinity. Altered prenylation resulted in a <2-fold decrease in affinity of the beta(1)gamma(2) dimer for rhodopsin and a <3-fold change for the beta(1)gamma(1) dimer. In each case with identical isoprenylation, the beta(1)gamma(2) dimer displayed significantly greater affinity for rhodopsin compared with the beta(1)gamma(1) dimer. Furthermore, dimers containing chimeric Ggamma chains with identical geranylgeranyl modification displayed rhodopsin affinities largely determined by the carboxyl-terminal one-third of the protein. These results indicate that isoprenoid modification of the Ggamma subunit is essential for binding to both Galpha and receptors. The isoprenoid type influences the binding affinity for receptors, but not for Galpha. Finally, the primary structure of the Ggamma subunit provides a major contribution to receptor binding of Gbetagamma, with the carboxyl-terminal sequence conferring receptor selectivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11602594     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M107129200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  9 in total

Review 1.  Structural determinants involved in the formation and activation of G protein betagamma dimers.

Authors:  William E McIntire
Journal:  Neurosignals       Date:  2009-02-12

2.  A dominant-negative Galpha mutant that traps a stable rhodopsin-Galpha-GTP-betagamma complex.

Authors:  Sekar Ramachandran; Richard A Cerione
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Signaling states of rhodopsin in rod disk membranes lacking transducin βγ-complex.

Authors:  Elena Lomonosova; Alexander V Kolesnikov; Vladimir J Kefalov; Oleg G Kisselev
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Comprehensive analysis of heterotrimeric G-protein complex diversity and their interactions with GPCRs in solution.

Authors:  Matthias Hillenbrand; Christian Schori; Jendrik Schöppe; Andreas Plückthun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Central and C-terminal domains of heterotrimeric G protein gamma subunits differentially influence the signaling necessary for primordial germ cell migration.

Authors:  Timothy Mulligan; Steven A Farber
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 4.315

6.  Prenylation-deficient G protein gamma subunits disrupt GPCR signaling in the zebrafish.

Authors:  Timothy Mulligan; Heiko Blaser; Erez Raz; Steven A Farber
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.315

Review 7.  Subtype-dependent regulation of Gβγ signalling.

Authors:  Mithila Tennakoon; Kanishka Senarath; Dinesh Kankanamge; Kasun Ratnayake; Dhanushan Wijayaratna; Koshala Olupothage; Sithurandi Ubeysinghe; Kimberly Martins-Cannavino; Terence E Hébert; Ajith Karunarathne
Journal:  Cell Signal       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.850

8.  Towards complete sets of farnesylated and geranylgeranylated proteins.

Authors:  Sebastian Maurer-Stroh; Manfred Koranda; Wolfgang Benetka; Georg Schneider; Fernanda L Sirota; Frank Eisenhaber
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  A model for how Gβγ couples Gα to GPCR.

Authors:  William E McIntire
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.086

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.