Literature DB >> 11601800

Overview of refractive surgery.

K S Bower1, E D Weichel, T J Kim.   

Abstract

Patients with myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism can now reduce or eliminate their dependence on contact lenses and eyeglasses through refractive surgery that includes radial keratotomy (RK), photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), laser thermal keratoplasty (LTK) and intrastromal corneal rings (ICR). Since the approval of the excimer laser in 1995, the popularity of RK has declined because of the superior outcomes from PRK and LASIK. In patients with low-to-moderate myopia, PRK produces stable and predictable results with an excellent safety profile. LASIK is also efficacious, predictable and safe, with the additional advantages of rapid vision recovery and minimal pain. LASIK has rapidly become the most widely performed refractive surgery, with high patient and surgeon satisfaction. Noncontact Holium: YAG LTK provides satisfactory correction in patients with low hyperopia. ICR offers patients with low myopia the potential advantage of removal if the vision outcome is unsatisfactory. Despite the current widespread advertising and media attention about laser refractive surgery, not all patients are good candidates for this surgery. Family physicians should be familiar with the different refractive surgeries and their potential complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11601800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Fam Physician        ISSN: 0002-838X            Impact factor:   3.292


  6 in total

1.  Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Nicolás Kahuam-López; Alejandro Navas; Carlos Castillo-Salgado; Enrique O Graue-Hernandez; Aida Jimenez-Corona; Antonio Ibarra
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-07

2.  Post photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) infectious keratitis; six-year experience of a tertiary eye hospital.

Authors:  Mohammad Soleimani; Mohammad Keykhaei; Seyed Ali Tabatabaei; Mansoor Shahriari; Hossein Farrokhpour; Bahareh Ramezani; Kasra Cheraqpour
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Biomechanical Simulation of Stress Concentration and Intraocular Pressure in Corneas Subjected to Myopic Refractive Surgical Procedures.

Authors:  Po-Jen Shih; I-Jong Wang; Wen-Feng Cai; Jia-Yush Yen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Comparison of microkeratome assisted sub-Bowman keratomileusis with photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  Talal A Althomali
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-29

5.  Validation of the Arabic version of the quality of life impact of refractive correction questionnaire.

Authors:  Kholoud A Bokhary; Elham S Alshamrani; Khalid F Jamous; Rania Fahmy
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-11

Review 6.  Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia.

Authors:  Jocelyn Kuryan; Anjum Cheema; Roy S Chuck
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.