Literature DB >> 11601725

The role of flow-independent viscoelasticity in the biphasic tensile and compressive responses of articular cartilage.

C Y Huang1, V C Mow, G A Ateshian.   

Abstract

A long-standing challenge in the biomechanics of connective tissues (e.g., articular cartilage, ligament, tendon) has been the reported disparities between their tensile and compressive properties. In general, the intrinsic tensile properties of the solid matrices of these tissues are dictated by the collagen content and microstructural architecture, and the intrinsic compressive properties are dictated by their proteoglycan content and molecular organization as well as water content. These distinct materials give rise to a pronounced and experimentally well-documented nonlinear tension-compression stress-strain responses, as well as biphasic or intrinsic extracellular matrix viscoelastic responses. While many constitutive models of articular cartilage have captured one or more of these experimental responses, no single constitutive law has successfully described the uniaxial tensile and compressive responses of cartilage within the same framework. The objective of this study was to combine two previously proposed extensions of the biphasic theory of Mow et al. [1980, ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 102, pp. 73-84] to incorporate tension-compression nonlinearity as well as intrinsic viscoelasticity of the solid matrix of cartilage. The biphasic-conewise linear elastic model proposed by Soltz and Ateshian [2000, ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 122, pp. 576-586] and based on the bimodular stress-strain constitutive law introduced by Curnier et al. [1995, J. Elasticity, 37, pp. 1-38], as well as the biphasic poroviscoelastic model of Mak [1986, ASME J. Biomech. Eng., 108, pp. 123-130], which employs the quasi-linear viscoelastic model of Fung [1981, Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, Springer-Verlag, New York], were combined in a single model to analyze the response of cartilage to standard testing configurations. Results were compared to experimental data from the literature and it was found that a simultaneous prediction of compression and tension experiments of articular cartilage, under stress-relaxation and dynamic loading, can be achieved when properly taking into account both flow-dependent and flow-independent viscoelasticity effects, as well as tension-compression nonlinearity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11601725     DOI: 10.1115/1.1392316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  53 in total

1.  Poroelasticity of cartilage at the nanoscale.

Authors:  Hadi Tavakoli Nia; Lin Han; Yang Li; Christine Ortiz; Alan Grodzinsky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Temperature effects in articular cartilage biomechanics.

Authors:  Ronald K June; David P Fyhrie
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Effects of tension-compression nonlinearity on solute transport in charged hydrated fibrous tissues under dynamic unconfined compression.

Authors:  Chun-Yuh Huang; Wei Yong Gu
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Anisotropy, inhomogeneity, and tension-compression nonlinearity of human glenohumeral cartilage in finite deformation.

Authors:  Chun-Yuh Huang; Anna Stankiewicz; Gerard A Ateshian; Van C Mow
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Effects of mechanical compression on metabolism and distribution of oxygen and lactate in intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Chun-Yuh Huang; Wei Yong Gu
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Dynamic response of immature bovine articular cartilage in tension and compression, and nonlinear viscoelastic modeling of the tensile response.

Authors:  Seonghun Park; Gerard A Ateshian
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Contribution of glycosaminoglycans to viscoelastic tensile behavior of human ligament.

Authors:  Trevor J Lujan; Clayton J Underwood; Nathan T Jacobs; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2008-12-12

8.  Modeling the matrix of articular cartilage using a continuous fiber angular distribution predicts many observed phenomena.

Authors:  Gerard A Ateshian; Vikram Rajan; Nadeen O Chahine; Clare E Canal; Clark T Hung
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  A nonlinear constituent based viscoelastic model for articular cartilage and analysis of tissue remodeling due to altered glycosaminoglycan-collagen interactions.

Authors:  Gregory C Thomas; Anna Asanbaeva; Pasquale Vena; Robert L Sah; Stephen M Klisch
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Molecular NMR T2 values can predict cartilage stress-relaxation parameters.

Authors:  Ronald K June; David P Fyhrie
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 3.575

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.