Literature DB >> 11600338

Mechanisms of Douglas-fir resistance to western spruce budworm defoliation: bud burst phenology, photosynthetic compensation and growth rate.

Z Chen1, T E Kolb, K M Clancy.   

Abstract

We compared growth rates among mature interior Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Beissn.) Franco) trees showing resistance or susceptibility to defoliation caused by western spruce budworm (Choristoneura occidentalis Freeman), and among clones and half-sib seedling progeny of these trees in a greenhouse. We also investigated bud burst phenology and photosynthetic responses of clones to budworm defoliation in greenhouse experiments. Resistant mature trees had a higher radial growth rate than susceptible trees, especially during periods of budworm defoliation. Clones from resistant trees grew larger crowns than clones from susceptible trees, whereas stem base diameter at the ground line and height did not differ. Half-sib seedling progeny from resistant trees had larger stem diameter, height, and total biomass than progeny from susceptible trees. Mean 5-year radial growth increment of mature trees was more strongly correlated with growth of seedlings than with growth of clones. Clones from resistant trees had later bud burst than clones from susceptible trees, and budworm defoliation of clones depended on the degree of synchrony between bud burst phenology and budworm larval feeding. Clones of resistant and susceptible mature trees showed similar responses of net photosynthetic rate to 2 years of budworm defoliation. We conclude that phenotypic differences in crown condition of Douglas-fir trees following western spruce budworm defoliation are influenced by tree genotype and that high growth rate and late bud burst phenology promote tree resistance to budworm defoliation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11600338     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/21.16.1159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  6 in total

1.  Putting the insect into the birch-insect interaction.

Authors:  Erkki Haukioja
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The effects of phenological mismatches on demography.

Authors:  Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Toke Thomas Høye; David W Inouye; Eric Post
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Climate change, phenological shifts, eco-evolutionary responses and population viability: toward a unifying predictive approach.

Authors:  Stéphanie Jenouvrier; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  The role of monoterpenes in resistance of Douglas fir to western spruce budworm defoliation.

Authors:  Zhong Chen; Thomas E Kolb; Karen M Clancy
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Phenological variation as protection against defoliating insects: the case of Quercus robur and Operophtera brumata.

Authors:  Olli-Pekka Tikkanen; Riitta Julkunen-Tiitto
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Phenology-dependent variation in the non-structural carbohydrates of broadleaf evergreen species plays an important role in determining tolerance to defoliation (or herbivory).

Authors:  Zhicheng Chen; Lin Wang; Yongxin Dai; Xianchong Wan; Shirong Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.