Literature DB >> 11600241

Differences in autonomic physiological responses between good and poor inductive reasoners.

C Melis1, A van Boxtel.   

Abstract

We investigated individual- and task-related differences in autonomic physiological responses induced by time limited figural and verbal inductive reasoning tasks. In a group of 52 participants, the percentage of correctly responded task items was evaluated together with nine different autonomic physiological response measures and respiration rate (RR). Weighted multidimensional scaling analyses of the physiological responses revealed three underlying dimensions, primarily characterized by RR, parasympathetic, and sympathetic activity. RR and sympathetic activity appeared to be relatively more important response dimensions for poor reasoners, whereas parasympathetic responsivity was relatively more important for good reasoners. These results suggest that poor reasoners showed higher levels of cognitive processing intensity than good reasoners. Furthermore, for the good reasoners, the dimension of sympathetic activity was relatively more important during the figural than during the verbal reasoning task, which was explained in terms of hemispheric lateralization in autonomic function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11600241     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0511(01)00112-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychol        ISSN: 0301-0511            Impact factor:   3.251


  3 in total

1.  Neural correlates of fast pupil dilation in nonhuman primates: relation to behavioral performance and cognitive workload.

Authors:  R E Hampson; Ioan Opris; S A Deadwyler
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Slow yoga breathing improves mental load in working memory performance and cardiac activity among yoga practitioners.

Authors:  Singh Deepeshwar; Rana Bal Budhi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-14

3.  Cardiac autonomic function and cognitive performance in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Michael Kühne; Christine S Zuern; Peter Hämmerle; Stefanie Aeschbacher; Anne Springer; Ceylan Eken; Michael Coslovsky; Gilles Dutilh; Giorgio Moschovitis; Nicolas Rodondi; Patricia Chocano; David Conen; Stefan Osswald
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 5.460

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.