Literature DB >> 11598599

Reduced lighting does not improve medical outcomes in very low birth weight infants.

K A Kennedy1, A R Fielder, R J Hardy, B Tung, D C Gordon, J D Reynolds.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To objectively assess the effect of light reduction as an isolated environmental intervention on neonatal morbidity. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized multicenter trial. Neonates < 1251 g birth weight and < 31 weeks gestational age were randomly assigned to receive goggles or to a control group. Goggles that reduced visible light by 97% were placed within 24 hours of birth and remained in use until 31 weeks postmenstrual age or for a minimum of 4 weeks.
RESULTS: Four hundred nine infants were enrolled, and outcome data are reported for 359 surviving infants. There were no significant differences between the groups in weight gain, duration of oxygen therapy, mechanical ventilation, or hospital stay either in the unadjusted analyses or in the analyses adjusted for birth weight, gestational age, race, sex, and inborn (born in study hospital) status. There was no difference between the groups in the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage.
CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial of continuous light reduction in the first few weeks of life for very low birth weight infants showed no effect on medical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11598599     DOI: 10.1067/mpd.2001.117579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  8 in total

Review 1.  Iatrogenic environmental hazards in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Thomas T Lai; Cynthia F Bearer
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.430

2.  The Development of Circadian Rhythms: From Animals To Humans.

Authors:  Scott A Rivkees
Journal:  Sleep Med Clin       Date:  2007-09-01

Review 3.  Impact of hospital-based environmental exposures on neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants.

Authors:  Janelle Santos; Sarah E Pearce; Annemarie Stroustrup
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.856

4.  Timing for the Introduction of Cycled Light for Extremely Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Debra H Brandon; Susan G Silva; Jinhee Park; William Malcolm; Heba Kamhawy; Diane Holditch-Davis
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.228

Review 5.  Cycled light in the intensive care unit for preterm and low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Iris Morag; Arne Ohlsson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-10

6.  Clinical trials - more than an assessment of treatment effect: LXV Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture.

Authors:  Frederick L Ferris
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 7.  Early light reduction for preventing retinopathy of prematurity in very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Eliane C Jorge; Edson N Jorge; Regina P El Dib
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-08-06

8.  Light Reduction Capabilities of Homemade and Commercial Incubator Covers in NICU.

Authors:  Susan M Ludington-Hoe; Amel Abouelfettoh
Journal:  ISRN Nurs       Date:  2013-10-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.