Literature DB >> 11598451

Endoscopic treatment of vesico-ureteral reflux: twelve years' experience.

N Capozza1, M Patricolo, A Lais, E Matarazzo, P Caione.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Over the past 12 years, endoscopic treatment of vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) has gained in popularity and has proved successful in a high percentage of cases. With improvements in injectable materials and more experience with the technique, the indications for endoscopic treatment have broadened. In the present paper we report our experience on 679 patients and 953 refluxing ureters, treated over the past 12 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reflux ranged from grade II to grade IV. In the first 14 cases Teflon was injected. After 1989, bovine dermal collagen was used in 442 children and, more recently, the Deflux system, a nonallergenic, biodegradable dextranomer in sodium hyaluronan in 223 children. All patients were clinically investigated for voiding dysfunctions and all completed a 1-year follow-up.
RESULTS: After 1 or 2 injections the 1-year cystogram showed no VUR in 686 ureters (72%). In grade II, III and IV success rates were, respectively, 83, 69 and 41%. Complications were minimal (1%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm endoscopic treatment of VUR is a valid alternative to long-term antibiotic prophylaxis and to open surgery in selected patients. The treatment often failed because of injected material displacement possibly due to voiding dysfunction. The short hospital stay, absence of significant postoperative complications, safety of the available injectable materials and high success rate suggest that endoscopic treatment should be offered to all children with grade II and III VUR, whereas it is questionable in patients with grade IV VUR. In patients with voiding dysfunction, appropriate therapy and voiding rehabilitation should precede treatment of VUR. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11598451     DOI: 10.1159/000050993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  7 in total

1.  Histological response to injected dextranomer-based implant in a rat model.

Authors:  Murat Alkan; Arbay O Ciftci; Beril Talim; Mehmet E Senocak; Melda Caglar; Nebil Buyukpamukcu
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 2.  The endoscopic treatment of incontinence in children.

Authors:  Paolo Caione; Alberto Lais
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Role of the Teflon deposit in the recurrence of vesicoureteral reflux.

Authors:  Zsolt Oberritter; Reka Somogyi; Zsolt Juhasz; Andrew B Pinter
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Urethral injection for stress urinary incontinence: long-term results with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer.

Authors:  A M Stenberg; G Larsson; P Johnson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2003-09-13

5.  Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children with subureteral dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection: a single-centre, 7-year experience.

Authors:  Mihovil Biočić; Jakov Todorić; Dražen Budimir; Andrea Cvitković Roić; Zenon Pogorelić; Ivo Jurić; Tomislav Šušnjar
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Results of Treatment of Grades IV and V Vesicoureteral Reflux with Endoscopic Injection of Polyacrylate Polyalcohol Copolymer.

Authors:  Francisco Ignacio De Badiola; Ricardo Soria; Roberto Luis Vagni; María Nieves Ormaechea; Juan Manuel Moldes; César Benmaor
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Prevalence of Bladder and Bowel Dysfunction in Toilet-Trained Children With Urinary Tract Infection and/or Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jitendra Meena; Georgie Mathew; Pankaj Hari; Aditi Sinha; Arvind Bagga
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 3.418

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.