Literature DB >> 11598231

fw2.2 directly affects the size of developing tomato fruit, with secondary effects on fruit number and photosynthate distribution.

T C Nesbitt1, S D Tanksley.   

Abstract

fw2.2 is a quantitative trait locus responsible for approximately 30% of the difference in fruit size between large, domesticated tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) and their small-fruited wild relatives. The gene underlying this quantitative trait locus was cloned recently and shown to be associated with altered cell division in ovaries (Frary et al., 2000). However, it was not known whether the change in fruit size is associated with other changes in plant morphology or overall fruit yield-changes that could potentially cause the fruit weight phenotype. To shed light on this issue, a detailed comparison was made between nearly isogenic lines differing for alleles at this locus to search for pleiotropic effects associated with fw2.2. Field observations show that although the small-fruited nearly isogenic line produced smaller ovaries and fruit as expected, this was compensated by a larger number of fruit-due mainly to a significantly greater number of inflorescences-but with no net change in total fruit mass yield. This strongly suggests that fw2.2 may have a pleiotropic effect on how the plant distributes photosynthate among fruit. In a flower removal experiment to control for differences in inflorescence size and number, fruit size remained significantly different between the nearly isogenic lines. These observations indicate that the primary effect of fw2.2 is in controlling ovary and fruit size, and that other associated phenotypic effects are secondary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11598231      PMCID: PMC125092     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  7 in total

1.  fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size.

Authors:  A Frary; T C Nesbitt; S Grandillo; E Knaap; B Cong; J Liu; J Meller; R Elber; K B Alpert; S D Tanksley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-07-07       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Antisense inhibition of tomato fruit sucrose synthase decreases fruit setting and the sucrose unloading capacity of young fruit.

Authors:  M A D'Aoust; S Yelle; B Nguyen-Quoc
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  A new D-type cyclin of Arabidopsis thaliana expressed during lateral root primordia formation.

Authors:  L De Veylder; J de Almeida Engler; S Burssens; A Manevski; B Lescure; M Van Montagu; G Engler; D Inzé
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  EFFECTS OF CORRELATION BETWEEN VEGETATIVE AND REPRODUCTIVE FUNCTIONS IN THE TOMATO (LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM MILL.).

Authors:  A E Murneek
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1926-01       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Phosphorylation of the S. cerevisiae Cdc25 in response to glucose results in its dissociation from Ras.

Authors:  E Gross; D Goldberg; A Levitzki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992 Dec 24-31       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  An introgression line population of Lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL.

Authors:  Y Eshed; D Zamir
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Inhibition of the ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase in transgenic potatoes leads to sugar-storing tubers and influences tuber formation and expression of tuber storage protein genes.

Authors:  B Müller-Röber; U Sonnewald; L Willmitzer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.598

  7 in total
  22 in total

1.  Generation and analysis of an artificial gene dosage series in tomato to study the mechanisms by which the cloned quantitative trait locus fw2.2 controls fruit size.

Authors:  Jiping Liu; Bin Cong; Steven D Tanksley
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Mapping of yield-related QTLs in pepper in an interspecific cross of Capsicum annuum and C. frutescens.

Authors:  G U Rao; A Ben Chaim; Y Borovsky; I Paran
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2003-02-14       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 3.  The genetic, developmental, and molecular bases of fruit size and shape variation in tomato.

Authors:  Steven D Tanksley
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  Pleiotropic effects of the duplicate maize FLORICAULA/LEAFY genes zfl1 and zfl2 on traits under selection during maize domestication.

Authors:  Kirsten Bomblies; John F Doebley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The tomato early fruit specific gene Lefsm1 defines a novel class of plant-specific SANT/MYB domain proteins.

Authors:  Rivka Barg; Irina Sobolev; Tali Eilon; Amit Gur; Inna Chmelnitsky; Sara Shabtai; Erich Grotewold; Yehiam Salts
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Fine mapping of a quantitative trait locus for grain number per panicle from wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.).

Authors:  Feng Tian; Zuofeng Zhu; Boshen Zhang; Lubin Tan; Yongcai Fu; Xiangkun Wang; Chuan Qing Sun
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Molecular characterization and functional analysis of "fruit-weight 2.2-like" gene family in rice.

Authors:  Jun Xu; Wentao Xiong; Baobao Cao; Tianze Yan; Tao Luo; Tingting Fan; Meizhong Luo
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.116

8.  Natural alleles at a tomato fruit size quantitative trait locus differ by heterochronic regulatory mutations.

Authors:  Bin Cong; Jiping Liu; Steven D Tanksley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Evaluating the genetic basis of multiple-locule fruit in a broad cross section of tomato cultivars.

Authors:  L S Barrero; S D Tanksley
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Patterns of selection and tissue-specific expression among maize domestication and crop improvement loci.

Authors:  Kristina M Hufford; Payan Canaran; Doreen H Ware; Michael D McMullen; Brandon S Gaut
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.