Literature DB >> 11597813

Neurocognitive outcome in brain metastases patients treated with accelerated-fractionation vs. accelerated-hyperfractionated radiotherapy: an analysis from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 91-04.

W F Regine1, C Scott, K Murray, W Curran.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate neurocognitive outcome as measured by the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) among patients with unresectable brain metastases randomly assigned to accelerated fractionation (AF) vs. accelerated hyperfractionated (AH) whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) accrued 445 patients with unresectable brain metastases to a Phase III comparison of AH (1.6 Gy b.i.d. to 54.4 Gy) vs. AF (3 Gy q.d. to 30 Gy). All had a KPS of >or= 70 and a neurologic function status of 0-2. Three hundred fifty-nine patients had MMSEs performed and were eligible for this analysis. Changes in the MMSE were analyzed according to criteria previously defined in the literature.
RESULTS: The median survival was 4.5 months for both arms. The average change in MMSE at 2 and 3 months was a drop of 1.4 and 1.1, respectively, in the AF arm as compared to a drop of 0.7 and 1.3, respectively, in the AH arm (p = NS). Overall, 91 patients at 2 months and 23 patients at 3 months had both follow-up MMSE and computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging documentation of the status of their brain metastases. When an analysis was performed taking into account control of brain metastases, a significant effect on MMSE was observed with time and associated proportional increase in uncontrolled brain metastases. At 2 months, the average change in MMSE score was a drop of 0.6 for those whose brain metastases were radiologically controlled as compared to a drop of 1.9 for those with uncontrolled brain metastases (p = 0.47). At 3 months, the average change in MMSE score was a drop of 0.5 for those whose brain metastases were radiologically controlled as compared to a drop of 6.3 for those with uncontrolled brain metastases (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Use of AH as compared to AF-WBRT was not associated with a significant difference in neurocognitive function as measured by MMSE in this patient population with unresectable brain metastases and limited survival. However, control of brain metastases had a significant impact on MMSE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11597813     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01676-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  54 in total

Review 1.  Radiotherapy and chemotherapy of brain metastases.

Authors:  R Soffietti; A Costanza; E Laguzzi; M Nobile; R Rudà
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Radiotherapy: Neurocognitive considerations in the treatment of brain metastases.

Authors:  Nicholas F Marko; Robert J Weil
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Research on climate change and health: looking ahead.

Authors:  Sari Kovats
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 4.  Radiation Toxicity in the Central Nervous System: Mechanisms and Strategies for Injury Reduction.

Authors:  DeeDee Smart
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.934

5.  Neurocognitive functioning and health-related quality of life in patients treated with stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: a prospective study.

Authors:  Esther J J Habets; Linda Dirven; Ruud G Wiggenraad; Antoinette Verbeek-de Kanter; Geert J Lycklama À Nijeholt; Hanneke Zwinkels; Martin Klein; Martin J B Taphoorn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 6.  CNS complications of breast cancer: current and emerging treatment options.

Authors:  Evert C A Kaal; Charles J Vecht
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 7.  Treatment of brain metastases in lung cancer: strategies to avoid/reduce late complications of whole brain radiation therapy.

Authors:  Mark G Shaw; David L Ball
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2013-12

Review 8.  The role of whole brain radiation therapy in the management of newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Laurie E Gaspar; Minesh P Mehta; Roy A Patchell; Stuart H Burri; Paula D Robinson; Rachel E Morris; Mario Ammirati; David W Andrews; Anthony L Asher; Charles S Cobbs; Douglas Kondziolka; Mark E Linskey; Jay S Loeffler; Michael McDermott; Tom Mikkelsen; Jeffrey J Olson; Nina A Paleologos; Timothy C Ryken; Steven N Kalkanis
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Whole brain radiotherapy with a conformational external beam radiation boost for lung cancer patients with 1-3 brain metastasis: a multi institutional study.

Authors:  Nathalie Casanova; Zohra Mazouni; Sabine Bieri; Christophe Combescure; Alessia Pica; Damien C Weber
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Cognitive Sparing during the Administration of Whole Brain Radiotherapy and Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation: Current Concepts and Approaches.

Authors:  James C Marsh; Benjamin T Gielda; Arnold M Herskovic; Ross A Abrams
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.