Literature DB >> 11597796

Potential role of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of tumors of the maxillary sinus.

E J Adams1, C M Nutting, D J Convery, V P Cosgrove, J M Henk, D P Dearnaley, S Webb.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques to see whether doses to critical structures could be reduced while maintaining planning target volume (PTV) coverage in patients receiving conventional radiotherapy (RT) for carcinoma of the maxillary sinus because of the risk of radiation-induced complications, particularly visual loss. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Six patients who had recently received conventional RT for carcinoma of the maxillary sinus were studied. Conventional RT, 3D-CRT, and step-and-shoot IMRT plans were prepared using the same 2-field arrangement. The effect of reducing the number of segments in the IMRT beams was investigated.
RESULTS: 3D-CRT and IMRT reduced the brain and ipsilateral parotid gland doses compared with the conventional plans. IMRT reduced doses to both optic nerves; for the contralateral optic nerve, 15-segment IMRT plans delivered an average maximal dose of 56.4 Gy (range 53.9-59.3) compared with 65.7 Gy (range 65.3-65.9) and 64.2 Gy (range 61.4-65.6) for conventional RT and 3D-CRT, respectively. IMRT also gave improved PTV homogeneity and improved coverage, with an average of 8.5% (range 7.0-11.7%) of the volume receiving <95% of the prescription dose (64 Gy) compared with 14.7% (range 14.1-15.9%) and 15.1% (range 14.4-16.1%) with conventional RT and 3D-CRT, respectively. Little difference was found between the 15 and 7-segment plans, but 5 segments resulted in a reduced minimal PTV dose.
CONCLUSIONS: IMRT offers significant advantages over conventional RT and 3D-CRT techniques for treatment of maxillary sinus tumors. Good results can be obtained from 7 segments per beam without compromising the PTV coverage. This number of segments is practical for implementation in a busy RT department.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11597796     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01655-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  12 in total

1.  Proof of principle of ocular sparing in dogs with sinonasal tumors treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Jessica A Lawrence; Lisa J Forrest; Michelle M Turek; Paul E Miller; T Rockwell Mackie; Hazim A Jaradat; David M Vail; Richard R Dubielzig; Richard Chappell; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.363

Review 2.  Clinical application of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  O Ballivy; R Galiana Santamaría; A Lozano Borbalas; F Guedea Edo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Clinical evaluation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancers.

Authors:  S A Bhide; K L Newbold; K J Harrington; C M Nutting
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Coplanar VMAT vs. noncoplanar VMAT in the treatment of sinonasal cancer.

Authors:  Ning Zhong-Hua; Jiang Jing-Ting; Li Xiao-Dong; Mu Jin-Ming; Mo Jun-Chong; Jin Jian-Xue; Gao Ming; Li Qi-Lin; Gu Wen-Dong; Chen Lu-Jun; Pei Hong-Lei
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 5.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  José A Peñagarícano; Niko Papanikolaou
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  Comparison of conformal and intensity-modulated techniques for simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy of upper esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei-Hua Fu; Lu-Hua Wang; Zong-Mei Zhou; Jian-Rong Dai; Yi-Min Hu; Lu-Jun Zhao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Intensity modulated radiotherapy for sinonasal malignancies with a focus on optic pathway preservation.

Authors:  Alexander Chi; Nam P Nguyen; William Tse; Gill Sobremonte; Patrick Concannon; Angela Zhu
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 17.388

8.  Dosimetric comparison between coplanar and non coplanar field radiotherapy for ethmoid sinus cancer.

Authors:  Antoine Serre; Katia Idri; Pascal Fenoglietto; Norbert Ailleres; Lore Santoro; Claire Lemanski; Renaud Garrel; Marc Makeieff; Ali Allaw; Jean-Bernard Dubois; David Azria
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  A dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and non-coplanar intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer.

Authors:  Yuri Jeong; Sang-wook Lee; Jungwon Kwak; Ilsung Cho; Sang Min Yoon; Jong Hoon Kim; Jin-Hong Park; Eun Kyung Choi; Si Yeol Song; Young Seok Kim; Su Ssan Kim; Ji Hyeon Joo; Seung Do Ahn
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Initial clinical experience with ArcCHECK for IMRT/VMAT QA.

Authors:  Michalis Aristophanous; Yelin Suh; Pai C Chi; Luke J Whittlesey; Scott LaNeave; Mary K Martel
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.