Literature DB >> 11597728

Re-evaluation of refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation.

K Ohyashiki1, J Nishimaki, N Shoji, K Miyazawa, Y Kimura, J H Ohyashiki.   

Abstract

The category 'refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (RAEBt)' consists of two sub-sets; one group is categorized based on the percentage of blasts in the marrow (> or =20%) and other is based on the percentage of blasts in the peripheral blood (> or =5%). We separated RAEBt patients based on these two criteria and compared hematologic and clinical relevance to assess the reasonable basis for the new classification. All RAEBt patients showing peripheral blood (PB) blasts of > or =5% were re-classified as RAEB by the WHO classification. This subset of RAEBt patients had lower percentages of bone marrow (BM) blasts, and notably they showed frequent complex cytogenetic abnormalities, including -5/5q- and/or -7/7q-. Moreover, the RAEBt patients of this group had shorter survivals compared to RAEBt patients with BM blasts between 20 and 30%. We next assessed hematologic and clinical relevance between refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB) and RAEBt patients with PB blasts of > or =5%. Except for the percentage of blasts in the PB (P=0.0037) and BM (P=0.0073), there was no significant difference in hematologic or clinical features between RAEB patients with BM blasts of > or =11% and RAEBt patients with PB blasts of > or =5%. When MDS patients with PB blasts of > or =5% (RAEBt by the FAB classification) were included as RAEB-II based on the "MDS 2000 classification', there was a high frequency of patients with complex chromosome changes, involving 5q and 7q, with significant poorer outcome compared to those with RAEB-I. Although it is still controversial whether MDS patients with BM blasts 20% or more should be considered as acute leukemia, the utilization of the 'MDS 2000 classification' might be useful to designate MDS patients diagnosed based on the percentage of blasts in the peripheral blood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11597728     DOI: 10.1016/s0145-2126(01)00054-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leuk Res        ISSN: 0145-2126            Impact factor:   3.156


  3 in total

Review 1.  Who is WHO in myelodysplastic syndromes? Clinical implications of the WHO classification.

Authors:  Rami S Komrokji; John M Bennett
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.952

2.  Myelodysplastic Syndrome with 6q Deletion as the Sole Chromosome Abnormality in an Iranian Patient: A Case Report with Review of Literature.

Authors:  Shirin Ferdowsi; Reza Shirkoohi; Gholamreza Toogeh
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.429

3.  Azacitidine front-line in 339 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukaemia: comparison of French-American-British and World Health Organization classifications.

Authors:  Lisa Pleyer; Sonja Burgstaller; Reinhard Stauder; Michael Girschikofsky; Heinz Sill; Konstantin Schlick; Josef Thaler; Britta Halter; Sigrid Machherndl-Spandl; Armin Zebisch; Angelika Pichler; Michael Pfeilstöcker; Eva-Maria Autzinger; Alois Lang; Klaus Geissler; Daniela Voskova; Dietmar Geissler; Wolfgang R Sperr; Sabine Hojas; Inga M Rogulj; Johannes Andel; Richard Greil
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 17.388

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.