BACKGROUND: Cerebral vasospasm is a well-known and serious complication of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The means of monitoring and treatment of vasospasm have been widely studied. Each neurosurgical center develops a protocol based on their experience, availability of equipment and personnel, and cost, so as to keep morbidity and mortality rates as low as possible for their patients with vasospasm. METHODS: At the University of Illinois at Chicago, we have developed algorithms for the diagnosis and management of cerebral vasospasm based on the experience of the senior authors over the past 25 years. This paper describes in detail our approach to diagnosis and treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and vasospasm. Our discussion is highlighted with data from a retrospective analysis of 324 aneurysm patients. RESULTS: Over 3 years, 324 aneurysms were treated; 185 (57%) were clipped, 139 (43%) were coiled. The rate of vasospasm for the 324 patients was 27%. The rate of hydrocephalus was 32% for those patients who underwent clipping, and 29% for those coiled. The immediate outcomes for those who underwent clipping was excellent in 35%, good in 38%, poor in 15.5%, vegetative in 3%, and death in 8% of the patients. For those who underwent coiling the immediate outcome was excellent in 64%, good in 14.5%, vegetative in 2.5%, and death in 14.5% of the patients. These statistics include all Hunt and Hess grades. For those patients who underwent clipping, 51% were intact at 6 months follow-up, 15% had a permanent deficit, 10% had a focal cranial nerve deficit, and 2% had died from complications not directly related to the procedure. For those patients who had undergone coiling, 75% were intact at 6 months follow-up, 12.5% had a permanent deficit, and 12.5% had a cranial nerve deficit, with no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The morbidity and mortality of cerebral vasospasm is significant. A good outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is dependent upon careful patient management in the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative periods. The timely work-up and aggressive treatment of neurological deterioration, whether or not it is because of vasospasm, is paramount.
BACKGROUND:Cerebral vasospasm is a well-known and serious complication of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The means of monitoring and treatment of vasospasm have been widely studied. Each neurosurgical center develops a protocol based on their experience, availability of equipment and personnel, and cost, so as to keep morbidity and mortality rates as low as possible for their patients with vasospasm. METHODS: At the University of Illinois at Chicago, we have developed algorithms for the diagnosis and management of cerebral vasospasm based on the experience of the senior authors over the past 25 years. This paper describes in detail our approach to diagnosis and treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage and vasospasm. Our discussion is highlighted with data from a retrospective analysis of 324 aneurysmpatients. RESULTS: Over 3 years, 324 aneurysms were treated; 185 (57%) were clipped, 139 (43%) were coiled. The rate of vasospasm for the 324 patients was 27%. The rate of hydrocephalus was 32% for those patients who underwent clipping, and 29% for those coiled. The immediate outcomes for those who underwent clipping was excellent in 35%, good in 38%, poor in 15.5%, vegetative in 3%, and death in 8% of the patients. For those who underwent coiling the immediate outcome was excellent in 64%, good in 14.5%, vegetative in 2.5%, and death in 14.5% of the patients. These statistics include all Hunt and Hess grades. For those patients who underwent clipping, 51% were intact at 6 months follow-up, 15% had a permanent deficit, 10% had a focal cranial nerve deficit, and 2% had died from complications not directly related to the procedure. For those patients who had undergone coiling, 75% were intact at 6 months follow-up, 12.5% had a permanent deficit, and 12.5% had a cranial nerve deficit, with no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The morbidity and mortality of cerebral vasospasm is significant. A good outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is dependent upon careful patient management in the preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative periods. The timely work-up and aggressive treatment of neurological deterioration, whether or not it is because of vasospasm, is paramount.
Authors: Jean G de Oliveira; Jürgen Beck; Christian Ulrich; Julian Rathert; Andreas Raabe; Volker Seifert Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2006-10-24 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Shaurya Taran; Vatsal Trivedi; Jeffrey M Singh; Shane W English; Victoria A McCredie Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 3.210