Literature DB >> 11597529

Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparison to open radical nephrectomy.

S Y Nakada1, P Fadden, D F Jarrard, T D Moon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery is easier to learn than standard laparoscopy and simplifies intact specimen removal. We present our experience performing hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (HALRN) and compare it with contemporary open radical nephrectomy performed at our institution.
METHODS: We performed 18 HALRNs for renal tumors ranging in size from 2 to 11 cm (average 4.5). Patients ranged in age from 40 to 83 years (average 62.9). All patients underwent HALRN with intact removal through a 7 to 8-cm vertical midline incision through an impermeable wound protector. Two or three working ports were used. We retrospectively compared our results with the results of 18 open radical nephrectomies performed during the same period, with the patients matched for age, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists' score.
RESULTS: In the HALRN group, the average operating room time was 220.5 minutes, average length of stay 3.9 days, average time to return to normal activity 15.8 days, and average time to return to work 26.8 days. The median time to return to 100% normal was 28.0 days. No conversions or re-explorations were necessary in the HALRN series. The final pathologic examination revealed renal cell carcinoma in 15, oncocytoma in 1, angiomyolipoma in 1, and a complex cyst in 1. At a maximum of 48 months of follow-up (average 12.2), no recurrences were identified. Three deaths occurred in the series; 2 patients died with no evidence of disease and 1 patient died of metastatic disease (the nephrectomy was palliative). In the open group, the average operating room time was 117.8 minutes, average length of stay 5.1 days, average time to return to normal activity 23.5 days, and average time to return to work 52.2 days. The median time to return to 100% normal was 150 days, with 3 patients never returning to 100% normal.
CONCLUSIONS: Our series demonstrated that HALRN is a safe, effective, minimally invasive option for treating renal cell carcinoma and provides a shorter hospital stay (P = 0.02), earlier return to work (P = 0.04), and earlier return to 100% normal (P = 0.0002) than open radical nephrectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11597529     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01321-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  One hand is better than two: conversion from pure laparoscopic to the hand-assisted approach during difficult nephrectomy.

Authors:  Nishanthan Mahesan; Sirazum M Choudhury; M Shamim Khan; Declan G Murphy; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  The advantages of hand-assisted laparoscopy.

Authors:  Ravi Munver; Joseph J Del Pizzo; R Ernest Sosa
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.862

3.  Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal masses 7 centimeters or larger.

Authors:  James S Rosoff; Jay D Raman; R Ernest Sosa; Joseph J Del Pizzo
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Pretransplant bilateral hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in adult patients with polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  Fahim Zaman; Atta Nawabi; Kenneth D Abreo; Gazi B Zibari
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Incisional hernia following hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for renal cell cancer.

Authors:  Scott A Troxel; Sakti Das
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.