Literature DB >> 11596685

Computer versus lecture: a comparison of two methods of teaching oral medication administration in a nursing skills laboratory.

P R Jeffries1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of both an interactive, multimedia CD-ROM and a traditional lecture for teaching oral medication administration to nursing students. A randomized pretest/posttest experimental design was used. Forty-two junior baccalaureate nursing students beginning their fundamentals nursing course were recruited for this study at a large university in the midwestern United States. The students ranged in age from 19 to 45. Seventy-three percent reported having average computer skills and experience, while 15% reported poor to below average skills. Two methods were compared for teaching oral medication administration--a scripted lecture with black and white overhead transparencies, in addition to an 18-minute videotape on medication administration, and an interactive, multimedia CD-ROM program, covering the same content. There were no significant (p < .05) baseline differences between the computer and lecture groups by education or computer skills. Results showed significant differences between the two groups in cognitive gains and student satisfaction (p = .01), with the computer group demonstrating higher student satisfaction and more cognitive gains than the lecture group. The groups were similar in their ability to demonstrate the skill correctly. Importantly, time on task using the CD-ROM was less, with 96% of the learners completing the program in 2 hours or less, compared to 3 hours of class time for the lecture group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11596685     DOI: 10.3928/0148-4834-20011001-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Educ        ISSN: 0148-4834            Impact factor:   1.726


  5 in total

1.  Successful implementation of a novel internet hybrid surgery curriculum: the early phase outcome of thoracic surgery prerequisite curriculum e-learning project.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Gold; William B Begg; David Fullerton; Douglas Mathisen; Gordon Olinger; Mark Orringer; Edward Verrier
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Part 12: Education, implementation, and teams: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Mary E Mancini; Farhan Bhanji; John E Billi; Jennifer Dennett; Judith Finn; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma; Gavin D Perkins; David L Rodgers; Mary Fran Hazinski; Ian Jacobs; Peter T Morley
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  Hand Hygiene Teaching Strategies among Nursing Staff: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  María B Martos-Cabrera; Emilio Mota-Romero; Raúl Martos-García; José L Gómez-Urquiza; Nora Suleiman-Martos; Luis Albendín-García; Guillermo A Cañadas-De la Fuente
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Scientific writing: a randomized controlled trial comparing standard and on-line instruction.

Authors:  Amruta Phadtare; Anu Bahmani; Anand Shah; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  The effect of learning via module versus lecture teaching methods on the knowledge and practice of oncology nurses about safety standards with cytotoxic drugs in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.

Authors:  Khadijeh Abbasi; Maryam Hazrati; Nasrin Pourali Mohamadi; Abdolreza Rajaeefard
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2013-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.