Literature DB >> 11595723

Tumor uptake and elimination of 2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine (gemcitabine) after deoxycytidine kinase gene transfer: correlation with in vivo tumor response.

A W Blackstock1, H Lightfoot, L D Case, J E Tepper, S K Mukherji, B S Mitchell, S G Swarts, S M Hess.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We hypothesized that tumor uptake and elimination of 2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine/2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine 5'-triphosphate (dFdCyd/dFdCTP) would be altered after dCK gene transfer and that this change would result in an enhanced cytotoxic effect. To test this hypothesis, we examined dFdCyd/dFdCTP uptake and clearance in HT-29 human colon carcinoma xenografts in nude mice by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and fluorine-19 magnetic resonance spectroscopy (F-19 MRS). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: HT-29 tumors were grown from cells infected with either the retroviral vector alone (LNPO-LacZ) or vector containing the dCK gene (LNPO-dCK). HPLC and F-19 MRS analyses were performed after a single 160 mg/kg i.p. injection of dFdCyd. Tumor response was determined in animals receiving a similar dosing schedule of dFdCyd.
RESULTS: HPLC experiments revealed an increased tumor accumulation of dFdCTP in xenografts overexpressing dCK compared with wild-type controls (P < or = 0.05). dFdCTP in the dCK-infected tumors was easily identified at 24 h postinjection. Conversely, no dFdCTP could be detected in the control xenografts 14 h postinjection. Subsequent F-19 MRS experiments confirmed an altered uptake, revealing a 2.5-fold greater accumulation of dFdCyd/dFdCTP in the dCK xenografts. Whereas a modest tumor growth delay was observed in the wild-type tumors receiving dFdCyd, dCK xenografts demonstrated a marked tumor growth delay following treatment (P < or = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis that increased expression of dCK cDNA in HT-29 xenografts results in an enhanced dFdCTP accumulation and prolonged elimination kinetics, and ultimately a potentiated in vivo tumor response to dFdCyd. Related to these effects, changes in the overall tumor metabolism of dFdCyd/dFdCTP was detectable by noninvasive F-19 MRS. These data are relevant to future preclinical and clinical studies evaluating dCK gene transfer and dFdCyd therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11595723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  19 in total

1.  Gene expression levels as predictive markers of outcome in pancreatic cancer after gemcitabine-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Hayato Fujita; Kenoki Ohuchida; Kazuhiro Mizumoto; Soichi Itaba; Tetsuhide Ito; Kohei Nakata; Jun Yu; Tadashi Kayashima; Ryota Souzaki; Tatsuro Tajiri; Tatsuya Manabe; Takao Ohtsuka; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.715

2.  Novel deoxycytidine kinase gene polymorphisms: a population screening study in Caucasian healthy volunteers.

Authors:  M Joerger; T M Bosch; V D Doodeman; J H Beijnen; P H M Smits; J H M Schellens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  New frontiers and developing applications in 19F NMR.

Authors:  Jian-Xin Yu; Rami R Hallac; Srinivas Chiguru; Ralph P Mason
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 9.795

4.  Recombinant deoxyribonucleoside kinase from Drosophila melanogaster can improve gemcitabine based combined gene/chemotherapy for targeting cancer cells.

Authors:  Mahak Fatima; Muhammad Mubashar Iqbal Ahmed; Faiza Batool; Anjum Riaz; Moazzam Ali; Birgitte Munch-Petersen; Zeeshan Mutahir
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.363

5.  Human pancreatic cancer progression: an anarchy among CCN-siblings.

Authors:  Sushanta K Banerjee; Gargi Maity; Inamul Haque; Arnab Ghosh; Sandipto Sarkar; Vijayalaxmi Gupta; Donald R Campbell; Daniel Von Hoff; Snigdha Banerjee
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 5.782

6.  Kinetic investigation of the inhibitory effect of gemcitabine on DNA polymerization catalyzed by human mitochondrial DNA polymerase.

Authors:  Jason D Fowler; Jessica A Brown; Kenneth A Johnson; Zucai Suo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Cancer and leukemia group B (CALGB) 89805: phase II chemoradiation trial using gemcitabine in patients with locoregional adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  A William Blackstock; Joel E Tepper; Donna Niedwiecki; Donna R Hollis; Robert J Mayer; Margaret A Tempero
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2003

8.  Phase III, randomized study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine (fixed-dose rate infusion) compared with gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) in patients with pancreatic carcinoma E6201: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  Elizabeth Poplin; Yang Feng; Jordan Berlin; Mace L Rothenberg; Howard Hochster; Edith Mitchell; Steven Alberts; Peter O'Dwyer; Daniel Haller; Paul Catalano; David Cella; Al Bowen Benson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  The MUC4 mucin mediates gemcitabine resistance of human pancreatic cancer cells via the Concentrative Nucleoside Transporter family.

Authors:  N Skrypek; B Duchêne; M Hebbar; E Leteurtre; I van Seuningen; N Jonckheere
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Cytotoxic effects of gemcitabine-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles in pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  Kevin O Affram; Taylor Smith; Edward Ofori; Sunil Krishnan; Patrick Underwood; Jose G Trevino; Edward Agyare
Journal:  J Drug Deliv Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 3.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.