Literature DB >> 11595146

Characteristics of habituation of the sympathetic skin response to repeated electrical stimuli in man.

P Cariga1, M Catley, C J Mathias, P H Ellaway.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of repeating electrical peripheral nerve stimulation on latency, duration and amplitude of the sympathetic skin response (SSR).
METHODS: SSRs were elicited in all limbs by median and peroneal nerves stimuli. In 10 subjects, 20 stimuli were applied at random time intervals (15-20 s). Another test was performed in 7 subjects using the same protocol, but switching the stimulation site every 5 or 10 stimuli without warning.
RESULTS: The mean amplitude of right palmar response to right peroneal nerve stimulation decreased from 5.05+/-0.76 (SEM) mV at the first stimulus to 1.23+/-0.42 mV at the 20th stimulus (P<0.001). The latency did not change significantly (1473+/-82 to 1550+/-90 ms, P>0.1), while the duration increased (1872+/-356 to 3170+/-681 ms, P<0.001). Stimulation and recording at other sites showed similar trends. Changing the stimulation site failed to alter the adaptation process in terms of amplitude, latency or duration.
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in amplitude and duration of the SSRs to repeated electrical stimuli can occur in presence of constant latency and appear to be independent of the source of sensory input. Peripheral sweat gland mechanisms may be involved in the loss of amplitude and increase in duration of the SSR during habituation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11595146     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00647-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  12 in total

1.  Effects of azelnidipine and amlodipine on exercise-induced sympathoexcitation assessed by pupillometry in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  Yumi Koike; Tetsuya Kawabe; Kanami Nishihara; Naomi Iwane; Takuzo Hano
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.872

2.  Frequency-dependent selection of reflexes by pudendal afferents in the cat.

Authors:  Joseph W Boggs; Brian J Wenzel; Kenneth J Gustafson; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Sympathetic skin responses: the influence of electrical stimulus intensity and habituation on the waveform.

Authors:  Minoru Toyokura
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 4.435

4.  The sympathetic skin response habituation in sedentary subjects and sportsmen.

Authors:  Ahmet Yildiz; Sefa Gulturk; Ali Cetin; Sena Erdal; Abdullah Arslan
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 4.435

5.  Real-Time Bladder Pressure Estimation for Closed-Loop Control in a Detrusor Overactivity Model.

Authors:  Zhonghua Ouyang; Zachariah J Sperry; Nikolas D Barrera; Tim M Bruns
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Closed-loop sacral neuromodulation for bladder function using dorsal root ganglia sensory feedback in an anesthetized feline model.

Authors:  Zhonghua Ouyang; Nikolas Barrera; Zachariah J Sperry; Elizabeth C Bottorff; Katie C Bittner; Lance Zirpel; Tim M Bruns
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.079

7.  Sympathetic skin response in primary Raynaud's phenomenon.

Authors:  Mauro Mondelli; Renato de Stefano; Stefania Rossi; Alessandro Aretini; Clara Romano
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 4.435

8.  Skin autonomic reactivity to thermoalgesic stimuli.

Authors:  Pedro Schestatsky; Josep Valls-Solé; João Costa; Lucia León; Misericordia Veciana; Márcia L Chaves
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 4.435

9.  The effect of stimulation technique on sympathetic skin responses in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Elisabeth Chroni; Andreas A Argyriou; Panagiotis Polychronopoulos; Vassiliki Sirrou
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 4.435

10.  Augmentation of the sympathetic skin response after electrical train stimuli.

Authors:  A Emmer; S Mangalo; M E Kornhuber
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.