Literature DB >> 11595050

Fecundity of transgenic wild-crop hybrids of Cucurbita pepo (Cucurbitaceae): implications for crop-to-wild gene flow.

L J Spencer1, A A Snow.   

Abstract

Hybridization between crops and their weedy or wild relatives is an area of concern because the widespread use of genetically engineered crops may allow novel, beneficial transgenes to enter nearby populations. We compared fitness components of wild Cucurbita pepo from Arkansas, USA, with wild-crop hybrids derived from yellow squash (a cultivar of C. pepo with transgenic resistance to two viruses). Wild and hybrid progeny were grown in agricultural fields in Arkansas (1996-98) and Ohio (1996) in six similar experiments. Cross types (wild and hybrid) did not differ significantly in seedling survival, which exceeded 85% in all cases. In Ohio, where more detailed observations were made, hybrid plants produced 41% as many male flowers, 21% as many female flowers, and 28% as many seeds as wild plants. At all sites, flowering periods of the two cross types overlapped extensively. Putative virus symptoms were more common in wild plants than in hybrids. Lifetime fecundity varied considerably among sites and years. The average fecundity of hybrids ranged from 453 to 4497 seeds per plant and represented 15% - 53% of the numbers of seeds produced by wild plants in the same experiments. These results suggest that the F1 generation does not represent a strong barrier to the introgression of neutral or beneficial crop genes into free-living populations of C. pepo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11595050     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00890.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  9 in total

1.  Consequences of recurrent gene flow from crops to wild relatives.

Authors:  Ralph Haygood; Anthony R Ives; David A Andow
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Changes in fitness-associated traits due to the stacking of transgenic glyphosate resistance and insect resistance in Brassica napus L.

Authors:  J P Londo; M A Bollman; C L Sagers; E H Lee; L S Watrud
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Fitness and Ecological Risk of Hybrid Progenies of Wild and Herbicide-Tolerant Soybeans With EPSPS Gene.

Authors:  Laipan Liu; Li Zhang; Jianmei Fu; Wenjing Shen; Zhixiang Fang; Ying Dai; Ruizong Jia; Biao Liu; Jingang Liang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Fitness estimation through performance comparison of F1 hybrids with their parental species Oryza rufipogon and O. sativa.

Authors:  Zhi Ping Song; Bao-Rong Lu; Bin Wang; Jia Kuan Chen
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Incompatibility and competitive exclusion of genomic segments between sibling Drosophila species.

Authors:  Shu Fang; Roman Yukilevich; Ying Chen; David A Turissini; Kai Zeng; Ian A Boussy; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 6.  Genetically modified plants: public and scientific perceptions.

Authors:  Smita Rastogi Verma
Journal:  ISRN Biotechnol       Date:  2013-03-07

7.  Domesticated, Genetically Engineered, and Wild Plant Relatives Exhibit Unintended Phenotypic Differences: A Comparative Meta-Analysis Profiling Rice, Canola, Maize, Sunflower, and Pumpkin.

Authors:  Alejandra Hernández-Terán; Ana Wegier; Mariana Benítez; Rafael Lira; Ana E Escalante
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Non-random transmission of parental alleles into crop-wild and crop-weed hybrid lineages separated by a transgene and neutral identifiers in rice.

Authors:  Zhe Wang; Lei Wang; Zhi Wang; Bao-Rong Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Ambient insect pressure and recipient genotypes determine fecundity of transgenic crop-weed rice hybrid progeny: Implications for environmental biosafety assessment.

Authors:  Hui Xia; Hongbin Zhang; Wei Wang; Xiao Yang; Feng Wang; Jun Su; Hanbing Xia; Kai Xu; Xingxing Cai; Bao-Rong Lu
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 5.183

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.